Logo image
1721MO Safety and efficacy of olutasidenib, an IDH1 mutant inhibitor, for the treatment of recurrent/relapsed or locally advanced or metastatic IDH1 mutated chondrosarcoma
Abstract   Peer reviewed

1721MO Safety and efficacy of olutasidenib, an IDH1 mutant inhibitor, for the treatment of recurrent/relapsed or locally advanced or metastatic IDH1 mutated chondrosarcoma

R.L. Jones, R. Groisberg, J-Y. Blay, H. Colman, M. de la Fuente, M. Milhem, P. Roxburgh, M.M. Chao, H. Tian, F. Duffaud, …
Annals of oncology, Vol.35(Supplement 2), pp.S1031-S1032
09/2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.08.1813

View Online

Abstract

Background Chondrosarcomas (CS) are rare cartilaginous neoplasms with conventional CS (cCS) accounting for 90% of CS. Other variants consist of dedifferentiated, mesenchymal, and clear cell which all have distinct clinicopathologic features. Surgical excision is the mainstay of treatment. Chemotherapy is ineffective in cCS. Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 (IDH1/2m+) occur in 65% of CS and are thought to contribute to tumorigenesis. Consequently, inhibition of IDH1/2 m+ represents an attractive therapeutic option. We report the safety and efficacy of olutasidenib (OLU), an IDH1m+ inhibitor approved for recurrent/relapsed (R/R) AML, in patients with CS. Methods This analysis includes patients with R/R, locally advanced or metastatic CS treated with OLU 150mg BID in a phase Ib/II study evaluating OLU in IDH1m+ advanced solid tumors (NCT03684811). Results 23 patients were enrolled and 16 had cCS, 5 dedifferentiated and 1 each myxoid or unknown subtypes. Median age at consent was 57 years (yrs) (30-71) with a male preponderance (74%). Median number of prior regimens was 2 (1-5). Tumor grade (Gr) included 1 (4%) Gr1, 7 (30%) Gr2, 7 (30%) Gr3, and 8 (35%) unknown. At screening, 17 (74%) patients had metastatic disease while 2 (9%) had locally advanced disease, and 4 (17%) were unknown. 91% (21) patients experienced a treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) with 48% (11) with serious. 3 (13%) discontinued OLU due to a TEAE. In 21 response-evaluable patients, 11 (52%) had stable disease (SD), 8 (38%) had progressive disease (PD), and 2 (10%) not evaluable. Overall median PFS (mPFS) was 2.71 months (mos) (95% CI: 1.71, 4.88). Subset analysis of the 16 cCS patients showed 10 (63%) SD and 6 (37%) PD. mPFS in this cohort was 3.55 mos (95% CI: 1.74, 5.10) and among the 10 with SD, mPFS was 4.88 mos (95% CI: 1.81, 10.5) with 6 and 12 mos PFS at 100% and 90%, respectively. Notably, following disease progression, 2 patients continued OLU for >2 yrs due to clinical benefit including resolution of CNS metastatic lesions in one. Conclusions OLU was well tolerated and conferred durable disease control in cCS. OLU may represent a treatment option for patients with IDH1m+ cCS who otherwise have no other effective treatment.

Details

Metrics

43 Record Views
Logo image