Logo image
Back
Abstract 98: The Impact Of Aspiration Catheter Size On Thrombectomy Outcomes Using Adapt Technique-analysis From The STAR Registry
Abstract   Open access   Peer reviewed

Abstract 98: The Impact Of Aspiration Catheter Size On Thrombectomy Outcomes Using Adapt Technique-analysis From The STAR Registry

Eyad Almallouhi, Mohammad Anadani, Sami Al Kasab, Ilko Maier, Pascal M Jabbour, Joon-Tae Kim, Stacey C Quintero Wolfe, ansaar rai, Robert Starke, Marios Psychogios, …
Stroke (1970), Vol.54(Suppl_1), pp.A98-A98
02/2023
DOI: 10.1161/str.54.suppl_1.98
url
https://doi.org/10.1161/str.54.suppl_1.98View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Introductions: Clinical trials have shown that aspiration thrombectomy is as safe and effective as stent-retriever thrombectomy. Multiple improvements have been made to the aspiration technique over the last few years. In this study, we aim to assess the effect of aspiration catheter bore size on the outcomes of A direct aspiration first pass technique (ADAPT) thrombectomy. Methods: We included patients who underwent ADAPT thrombectomy for M1 or internal carotid artery terminus (ICA-T) occlusions in the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm (STAR) database. Patients included between July 2016 and July 2022. We compared baseline characteristics, procedural metrics and outcomes between patients who underwent thrombectomy using small bore (0.035"-0.060"), medium bore (0.062"-0.068") and large bore (0.070"-0.074") catheters. Results: A total of 1158 patients were included; 576 (49.7%) females, 645 (70%) White, and 464 (40.6%) received IV-tPA. No difference was noticed in age, sex, and vascular risk factors between the 3 different groups. There was higher rate of IV-tPA in the small-bore catheter group (48.8%) compared to the medium and large bore catheter groups (38.4% and 36.7%, respectively) (P=0.03). Procedure duration was shorter when using medium (20 min) and large (18 min) compared to small bore catheters (30 min) (P=0.01). Both medium and large bore catheters were associated with higher rate of successful recanalization (88.9% and 87.9%, respectively) compared to small bore catheters (81.6%) (P=0.010). However, the difference in successful recanalization or procedure duration between medium and large bore catheters was not significant. No difference was noted in the rate of symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation (sICH) (4.7%, 5.3%, and 7.1%; P=0.345), 90-day favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) (41.8%, 39.3%, 40.8%; P=0.766) or 90-day mortality (18.1%, 23.5%, 24.4%; P=0.111) between the groups. Conclusions: Higher rate of successful recanalization and shorter procedure duration were observed when using medium and large bore aspiration catheters compared with small bore catheters in ADAPT technique. However, these procedural benefits were not observed when comparing large bore to medium bore catheters.
 Stroke Reperfusion Device Endovascular Therapy

Details

Metrics

11 Record Views
Logo image