Logo image
Back
Differential Adaptability to Glutamine in Liver Versus Lung Metastasizing Breast Cancer Cells
Abstract   Open access   Peer reviewed

Differential Adaptability to Glutamine in Liver Versus Lung Metastasizing Breast Cancer Cells

Marjorie Anne Layosa, Keigo Tomoo, Michael Wendt, Stephen Hursting and Dorothy Teegarden
Current developments in nutrition, Vol.9(Supplement 2), p.149
05/01/2025
DOI: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.106379
url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.106379View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Objectives: Our work aims to compare the glutamine metabolic adaptations between breast cancer cells that preferentially metastasize to lung versus liver. Methods: Wnt-driven breast cancer cell models that preferentially metastasize to lung (metM-WntLung cells; MLg) or liver (metM-WntLiver cells; MLr) were utilized. Cells were exposed to low (0.5 mM), normal (2 mM), or high (4 mM) glutamine levels, and cell viability (MTT assay), 14C-glutamine uptake, 13C5-glutamine (100%) cellular flux, and mRNA abundance of metabolic enzymes were measured. Results: With normal glutamine, 14C-glutamine uptake was 26% higher in MLg compared to MLr. This result was consistent with higher mRNA level of glutamine-catabolizing enzymes, glutamate synthase and glutamate dehydrogenase (GLUD), and higher enrichment of M+5-glutamate and M+5-α-ketoglutarate in MLg than the MLr. These results suggest higher glutamine flux into the TCA cycle in MLg than the MLr. On the other hand, high glutamine increased viability by 18% in MLr but had no effect in MLg. To further examine mechanisms supporting higher viability of MLr under high glutamine conditions, cells were treated with NH4Cl (5 mM) as ammonia is a by-product of glutamine catabolism. Results showed that viability and mRNA level of the ammonia-utilizing enzyme, asparagine synthetase, were higher in MLr than MLg. These results suggest that MLr’s ability to better adapt to high glutamine is in part due to utilization of excess ammonia. Similarly, MLr were more viable by 12% than the MLg with low glutamine. Despite reduction in overall 13C5-glutamine flux under low glutamine in both cell lines, MLr had higher enrichment of unlabeled TCA metabolites. MLr also had higher mRNA level of pyruvate carboxylase and GLUD, enzymes that can utilize non-glutamine carbons to reduce reliance on glutamine, suggesting that MLr’s ability to adapt to low glutamine is in part due to higher utilization of non-glutamine sources. Conclusions: Overall, MLr adaptation, but not the MLg, to high glutamine is due to utilization of excess ammonia and to low glutamine due to utilization of non-glutamine carbons, respectively.

Details

Metrics

6 Record Views
Logo image