Logo image
GUIDELINE CONCORDANT ANTIPLATELET REGIMENS IN PATIENTS WHO UNDERWENT CAROTID ARTERY REVASCULARIZATION: INSIGHTS FROM THE VASCULAR QUALITY INITIATIVE REGISTRY
Abstract   Open access   Peer reviewed

GUIDELINE CONCORDANT ANTIPLATELET REGIMENS IN PATIENTS WHO UNDERWENT CAROTID ARTERY REVASCULARIZATION: INSIGHTS FROM THE VASCULAR QUALITY INITIATIVE REGISTRY

Zain Ahmed, Megan Lee, Jiaming Huang, Aaron Brice, Ahmad Arham, Yulanka Castro Dominguez, Edouard Aboian, Sameer Nagpal, Kim Smolderen and Carlos Mena Hurtado
Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol.77(18 Supplement 1), pp.1078-1078
05/11/2021
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(21)02437-2
url
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(21)02437-2View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Background Antiplatelet regimens for patients undergoing revascularization for carotid artery stenosis are guided by Class I recommendations, with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) indicated following carotid artery stenting (CAS) and single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) following carotid endarterectomy (CEA). It remains unknown how these guidelines are being adhered to in real world practice. Methods We examined patients who underwent CEA or CAS between January 1, 2014-December 31, 2019 from the Vascular Study Group of New England (VSGNE) registry. Median odds ratios (MORs) were adjusted for potential confounders to assess site variability. Results Of 12,257 patients, the mean age was 70.6 ± 9.1 years for CEA (n= 9,661) and 70.1 ± 9.9 years for CAS (n = 2,596). For the CEA cohort, 66.3% were discharged on SAPT and 5.9% were discharged on no antiplatelet agent. Other antiplatelet variations included 19.7% on DAPT and 1.8% on triple therapy (DAPT plus anticoagulation) following CEA. Among the CAS cohort, 81.7% were discharged on at least DAPT, 4.2% on SAPT, and 6.7% on no antiplatelet agent. The site variability as measured by adjusted MOR was 1.56 (95% CI: 1.09, 1.87) for being on SAPT following CEA and 1.62 (not significant) for being on at least DAPT following CAS (see Figure 1). Conclusion In a large, contemporary real-world registry, a high percentage of patients undergoing CAS appropriately received DAPT. However, there was greater variability in the use of SAPT following CEA with lower adherence rates.

Details

Metrics

1 Record Views
Logo image