Logo image
Back
Measuring harmonic benefit in musicians and non-musicians in several tasks
Abstract   Peer reviewed

Measuring harmonic benefit in musicians and non-musicians in several tasks

Daniel R. Guest, Neha Rajappa and Andrew J. Oxenham
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol.151(4 Suppl), pp.A224-A224
04/2022
DOI: 10.1121/10.0011132

View Online

Abstract

Prior work has demonstrated that harmonic tones are easier to detect in noise and yield better F0 discrimination in noise than inharmonic tones. These effects, referred to as harmonic benefit, appear to be approximately the same size in musicians and non-musicians, despite musicians’ overall better pitch discrimination. The present study aimed to replicate these findings and extend them to include measurements of harmonic benefit in other tasks. Non-musicians and musicians were compared in four tasks: detection in noise, F0 discrimination, FM detection, and AM detection. The stimuli in each task were either harmonic or inharmonic complex tones and were presented in threshold-equalizing noise at a range of signal-to-noise ratios. We found that harmonic benefit for F0 discrimination was large and remained large even after accounting for differences in the detectability of harmonic and inahrmonic tones. In contrast, harmonic benefit was small for FM and AM detection and could mostly be accounted for by differences in detectability. In contrast to prior studies, we found that musicians showed a larger harmonic benefit than non-musicians. These results provide insight into how musical training may specialize the auditory system for processing of harmonicity and pitch. [Work supported by NIH grants F31 DC019247 and R01 DC005216.]

Details

Metrics

1 Record Views
Logo image