Resumes for Selection: Ubiquitous in Use but Little Evidence of Criterion Validity

Liwen Zhang; Philip L. Roth; Chad Van Iddekinge; Erica Wen Chen; Mark S. Andrekovich; Jake T. Harrison

doi:10.5465/AMPROC.2025.10899abstract

Back

Resumes for Selection: Ubiquitous in Use but Little Evidence of Criterion Validity

Abstract

Open access

Resumes for Selection: Ubiquitous in Use but Little Evidence of Criterion Validity

Liwen Zhang, Philip L. Roth, Chad Van Iddekinge, Erica Wen Chen, Mark S. Andrekovich and Jake T. Harrison

Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, Vol.2025(1)

07/2025

DOI: 10.5465/AMPROC.2025.10899abstract

Files and links (1)

url

https://doi.org/10.5465/AMPROC.2025.10899abstractView

Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Abstract only Resume assessments are widely used in personnel selection, yet surprisingly little is known about the content and criterion-related validity of the assessments. We conducted this three-study effort to begin to address this issue. In Study 1, we related recruiter ratings of job applicant resumes with job performance and turnover in two samples. The two samples include recruiter ratings of 40 U.S. nurse applicants and 204 China sales applicants, and their job performance and turnover. We found converging results in both samples such that resume assessments were associated with low point estimates of validity (e.g., .04 to .07), and these estimates were not significantly related to job performance or turnover. In Study 2, we explored potential reasons for the poor validity of resume ratings by conducting a content analysis of applicant resumes. Results revealed that resumes include not only potentially job-relevant information such as education and experience, but also considerable job-irrelevant information such as sex, age, and political affiliation as well as little information indicating the quality of experience or past performance. In Study 3, we found that structuring resume assessments did not result in criterion-related validity. Overall, these results raise serious concerns about the validity of this longstanding selection procedure.

Details

Title: Subtitle: Resumes for Selection: Ubiquitous in Use but Little Evidence of Criterion Validity
Creators: Liwen Zhang - University of Macau
Philip L. Roth - Clemson University
Chad Van Iddekinge - University of Iowa
Erica Wen Chen - Renmin University of China
Mark S. Andrekovich - Clemson University
Jake T. Harrison - University of Iowa
Resource Type: Abstract
Publication Details: Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, Vol.2025(1)
DOI: 10.5465/AMPROC.2025.10899abstract
eISSN: 2151-6561
Language: English
Date published: 07/2025
Academic Unit: Management and Entrepreneurship
Record Identifier: 9985027359602771

Metrics

4 Record Views