Book chapter
The Monster Within: Representing Corporate Evil
Evil Corporations, pp.189-205
Routledge
07/04/2024
DOI: 10.4324/9781003402534-17
Abstract
But prosecutors may not be entirely to blame. They know full well how to foment moral disgust toward human villains. Corporate villains are very differently constituted. 1) They are commercial enterprises that lack the familiar hallmarks of moral agency. 2) The crimes they commit are often engineered by a small group of rogue insiders. And 3), even as corporations harm us, we owe our livelihoods and consumer comforts to them. In light of these attributes, narratively framing corporate misconduct in amoral, economic terms may seem unavoidable. With it, our sense of moral urgency disappears, along with our political will to push for change.
This chapter argues that prosecutors could do better. A rhetoric of corporate evil is possible. As proof of concept, prosecutors need only visit the theatre. Horror films solved the catch-22 of morally ambiguous evil decades ago. Three archetypes of horror cinema -zombies, demons and werewolves - raise rhetorical obstacles analogous to those that corporate prosecutors face. Directors of those films instil their audience with loathing toward antagonists that are borderline examples of moral agency, that act with an alien inner compulsion and that blend harm with help. By turning to the greats of horror, even economically attuned prosecutors may find tools for talking about corporate evil.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- The Monster Within: Representing Corporate Evil
- Creators
- Mihailis E. Diamantis
- Resource Type
- Book chapter
- Publication Details
- Evil Corporations, pp.189-205
- Publisher
- Routledge; Abingdon, Oxfordshire, England, UK
- DOI
- 10.4324/9781003402534-17
- Alternative title
- The Monster Within
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 07/04/2024
- Academic Unit
- Philosophy; Finance; Law Faculty
- Record Identifier
- 9984628218902771
Metrics
19 Record Views