Book chapter
Theory and Method in the Study of Ad and Brand Attitudes: Toward a Systemic Model
Attention, Attitude, and Affect in Response to Advertising, pp.125-148
L Erlbaum Associates
1994
DOI: 10.4324/9781315807386-8
Abstract
Advertisers traditionally study ad effects on ad attitudes (AAd), whereas academics study ad effects on brand attitudes. Researchers and practitioners run the risk of according too much importance to the AAd construct. The Systemic Model suggests that codefinition and comeasurement contaminate estimates of causation in AAd research. Codefinition and comeasurement inflate estimates of association and causality, because instruments designed to measure one construct will also measure another. If ads depict brand attributes, then consumers' ad and brand perceptions are codefined. Ad attitudes may reflect brand effects as well as the ad by brand interaction. The fact that AAd research often uses redundant scale items and noncounterbalanced measurement orders inflates the chances that method variance contaminates the data. Scale redundancy should increase the chances that responses to one scale will influence those to subsequent scales-so-called "method variance". Scale redundancy refers to the use of identical dimensions when measuring different constructs.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Theory and Method in the Study of Ad and Brand Attitudes: Toward a Systemic Model
- Creators
- Timothy B. Heath - University of PittsburghGary J. Gaeth - University of Iowa
- Contributors
- Eddie M. Clark (Editor)Timothy C. Brock (Editor)David W. Stewart (Editor)
- Resource Type
- Book chapter
- Publication Details
- Attention, Attitude, and Affect in Response to Advertising, pp.125-148
- DOI
- 10.4324/9781315807386-8
- Publisher
- L Erlbaum Associates; Hillsdale, NJ
- Alternative title
- 8. Study of Ad and Brand Attitudes
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 1994
- Academic Unit
- Marketing
- Record Identifier
- 9984963130802771
Metrics
1 Record Views