A not uncommon complaint concerning social choice models is that they tend to assume away everything of interest, leaving a model with little relation to the real world. The usual response is that one must start with the basic elements of a problem before moving to more complex and inclusive models. Unfortunately, few social choice models applied to legal studies have achieved sufficient complexity to be of significant value. Maxwell Stearns recognizes this problem and, in Constitutional Process, systematically presents a comprehensive social choice model and applies it to a complex legal doctrine.
Review
Review of: Constitutional Process: A Social Choice Analysis of Supreme Court Decision Making, By Maxwell L. Stearns
The American political science review, Vol.96(2), pp.432-433
06/2002
DOI: 10.1017/S0003055402590249
Abstract
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Review of: Constitutional Process: A Social Choice Analysis of Supreme Court Decision Making, By Maxwell L. Stearns
- Creators
- Timothy M. Hagle - University of Iowa
- Resource Type
- Review
- Publication Details
- The American political science review, Vol.96(2), pp.432-433
- DOI
- 10.1017/S0003055402590249
- ISSN
- 0003-0554
- eISSN
- 1537-5943
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2002 American Political Science Association. Used by permission. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=PSR
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 06/2002
- Academic Unit
- Political Science
- Record Identifier
- 9983557320002771
Metrics
893 File views/ downloads
46 Record Views