How Prior Programming Experience Affects Students' Pair Programming Experiences and Outcomes

Nicholas Bowman; Lindsay Jarratt; K.C Culver; Alberto Segre

doi:10.1145/3304221.3319781

Back

How Prior Programming Experience Affects Students' Pair Programming Experiences and Outcomes

Conference proceeding

Open access

How Prior Programming Experience Affects Students' Pair Programming Experiences and Outcomes

Nicholas Bowman, Lindsay Jarratt, K.C Culver and Alberto Segre

Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on innovation and technology in computer science education, pp.170-175

ITiCSE '19

07/02/2019

DOI: 10.1145/3304221.3319781

Files and links (1)

url

https://doi.org/10.1145/3304221.3319781View

Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Pair programming is a collaborative learning approach in computer science in which students (or employees) work closely with a partner on the same programming task. A long-standing question within pair programming is whether certain combinations of students lead to greater learning, effort, and/or performance. Earlier studies have explored the role of prior programming experience, including the discrepancy between partners' experience, as a potentially important factor in shaping these outcomes. However, the previous findings are highly inconsistent, which may result from divergent (and often suboptimal) ways of defining previous experience or skill, problems with self-selection into pairs, and small sample sizes that often yield nonsignificant results. The present study sought to improve on all of these limitations through an examination of 587 undergraduates who each participated in three different randomly assigned pairings. Not surprisingly, students' own programming experience was positively related to understanding concepts from lab, confidence in the finished product, and overall interest in computer science. However, students who worked with a more experienced partner actually had poorer outcomes, including lower effort exerted on the assignment, perceptions that their partner gave more effort than they did, less time in the driving role (i.e., typing out the assignment), lower understanding of concepts from lab, and less interest in computer science overall. The partner's experience is unrelated to other outcomes, including confidence in the finished assignment, feeling productive during lab session, and average grades received during the pairing. These results provide important considerations for the assignment of students to pairs.

College Students

Computer Science

collaborative learning

experimental research

pair characteristics

pair incompatibility

pair programming

programming experience

randomized controlled trial

student outcomes

university students

Details

Title: Subtitle: How Prior Programming Experience Affects Students' Pair Programming Experiences and Outcomes
Creators: Nicholas Bowman - University of Iowa
Lindsay Jarratt - University of Iowa
K.C Culver - University of Iowa
Alberto Segre - University of Iowa
Resource Type: Conference proceeding
Publication Details: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on innovation and technology in computer science education, pp.170-175
Series: ITiCSE '19
DOI: 10.1145/3304221.3319781
ISSN: 1942-647X
Publisher: ACM
Grant note: DOI: 10.13039/100000001, name: National Science Foundation, award: 1611908
Language: English
Date published: 07/02/2019
Academic Unit: Sociology and Criminology; Educational Policy and Leadership Studies; Nursing; Center for Social Science Innovation; Fraternal Order of Eagles Diabetes Research Center; Computer Science; Public Policy Center (Archive)
Record Identifier: 9984259435702771

Metrics

81 Record Views

37 Times Cited - Web of Science