Conference proceeding
Preference and performance regarding different image sizes when reading cranial CT
Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE, Vol.9037, pp.903706-903706-7
03/11/2014
DOI: 10.1117/12.2043871
Abstract
Radiology practice is based on the implicit assumption that preference for a particular presentation mode goes hand in hand with superior performance. The present experiment tests this assumption by asking 43 radiologists in two different facilities to interpret 20 cranial computed tomography (cCT) scans in two image sizes, 14 x 14 cm and 28 x 28 cm. The radiologists were asked to identify any intracranial hemorrhages on the images. Subsequently, they were asked to indicate which size they preferred and rated the two image sizes on a continuous scale in terms of how much they liked them. The results show no correlation between diagnostic accuracy, as measured by the JAFROC figure of merit, and preference rated on a continuous scale for both image sizes (large image: r = 0.14, p = 0.38; small images: r= 0.14, p = 0.39). Similarly, there was no significant correlation between reading efficiency, i.e. the time a radiologist took to read a case, and preference rated on the continuous scale (large image: r =- 0.07, p = 0.64; small images: r = -0.04, p = 0.80). Further, no significant differences with regard to diagnostic accuracy, reading efficiency and performance could be observed when comparing the two image sizes. The results strengthen the idea that one cannot automatically assume a connection between preference for a display mode and performance with regard to it.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Preference and performance regarding different image sizes when reading cranial CT
- Creators
- Antje C Venjakob - Technische Univ. Berlin (Germany)Tim Marnitz - Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Germany)Claudia R Mello-Thoms - The Univ. of Sydney (Australia)
- Contributors
- Claudia R Mello-Thoms (Editor) - The Univ. of Sydney (Australia)Matthew A Kupinski (Editor) - College of Optical Sciences, The Univ. of Arizona (United States)
- Resource Type
- Conference proceeding
- Publication Details
- Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE, Vol.9037, pp.903706-903706-7
- Publisher
- SPIE
- DOI
- 10.1117/12.2043871
- ISSN
- 1605-7422
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 03/11/2014
- Academic Unit
- Roy J. Carver Department of Biomedical Engineering; Radiology
- Record Identifier
- 9984051886002771
Metrics
10 Record Views