Logo image
Questioning monolingualism: the effects of bidialectal experience on language processing
Dissertation   Open access

Questioning monolingualism: the effects of bidialectal experience on language processing

Wenqi Zeng
University of Iowa
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), University of Iowa
Spring 2025
DOI: 10.25820/etd.008009
pdf
thesis_revised3.41 MBDownloadView
Open Access Free to read and download

Abstract

While previous research has extensively investigated how multilingual experience shapes linguistic and cognitive processing, much of this work has overlooked bidialectal speakers – individuals who navigate multiple linguistic systems within the same language. By treating bidialectal speakers as monolinguals, prior studies may have mischaracterized the nature of native language representation and processing, particularly in languages like Chinese, where bidialectalism is widespread. This dissertation examines the impact of bidialectal experience on speech production, perception, and language control, drawing parallels between bidialectal and bilingual processing while identifying nuanced distinctions between the two. This dissertation argues that bidialectalism constitutes a unique form of linguistic experience that requires greater integration into psycholinguistic models of multilingualism.The empirical studies presented in this dissertation investigated these questions from three experimental approaches. Chapter II examines the influence of using a second dialect on native tone production in Chengdu Mandarin-Standard Mandarin bidialectal speakers. The results reveal that the use of Standard Mandarin influences Chengdu Mandarin tone production. Bidialectal speakers who use Standard Mandarin more frequently exhibit dissimilatory drift in Chengdu Mandarin tones that are perceptually linked across the dialects and reduced within-dialect tonal contrast in Chengdu Mandarin tones without a clear Standard Mandarin counterpart. These findings are consistent with previous studies in bilingual production and align with bilingual speech learning models, suggesting that bidialectal speakers develop a shared phonetic space for both dialects. Chapter III investigates how bidialectal experience shapes cross-dialect tone perception, comparing Chengdu Mandarin-Standard Mandarin bidialectal speakers to monodialectal Standard Mandarin speakers. The results indicate that while both groups rely on acoustic similarity, bidialectal speakers additionally incorporate phonemic correspondence in their perceptual mapping. Moreover, individual differences multidimensional scaling analysis reveals that bidialectal speakers apply more stable cue-weighting strategies, prioritizing both pitch change direction and average pitch height to maintain phonetic contrast across dialects. In contrast, monodialectal speakers distinguish tones less consistently, especially on the dimension of pitch height. These findings demonstrate that bidialectal experience fundamentally reshapes the perceptual space. Chapter IV explores receptive dialect-switching in auditory word recognition, testing whether bidialectal speakers incur cognitive costs when mixing and switching between dialects, and whether the cost magnitude is influenced by the phonological similarity between the two dialects or dialect usage patterns. By comparing the dialect-switching performances between two groups of bidialectal speakers of Chengdu Mandarin-Standard Mandarin and Cantonese-Standard Mandarin, who differ in cross-dialect phonological similarity, Chapter IV reveals significant switch and mixing costs, modulated by dialect dominance but not phonological distance. The results indicate that bidialectal speakers employ both reactive and proactive control mechanisms akin to bilinguals. These findings highlight that bidialectal speakers engage in language control processes similar to bilinguals. Together, these studies challenge the traditional monolingual-versus-bilingual framework in conducting bilingual and multilingual research, highlighting that bidialectal experience is not merely a variation of monolingualism but a dynamic and interactive process that shapes phonetic, phonological and cognitive mechanisms in ways similar to bilingual experience. However, the findings also reveal nuanced differences between bidialectal and bilingual processing, suggesting that existing multilingual models must account for structural overlap, compartmentalized usage, and sociolinguistic factors specific to bidialectalism. By critically reassessing the monolingual model and advocating for a more inclusive framework, this dissertation contributes to a broader understanding of linguistic diversity and its implications for language representation and processing. Future research should extend these findings to diverse bidialectal populations and linguistic domains, refining our understanding of bidialectalism within the broader multilingual landscape.
bidialectalism bilingualism lexical tones Mandarin Chinese

Details

Metrics

3 File views/ downloads
98 Record Views
Logo image