Sepsis has a large morbidity and mortality burden among people at both extremes of age: young children and older adults. Variation in recognition and initial sepsis care may represent an opportunity to improve sepsis outcomes, especially for sepsis patients that live farther from and initially present to hospitals where they may require subsequent transfer. This dissertation evaluates: (1) if an existing pediatric quality improvement program (“pediatric readiness”) improves sepsis outcomes for children, (2) if how far a child lives from a hospital affects how long they stay in the hospital with sepsis, and (3) the qualities of hospitals that accept older adult sepsis patients from other hospitals when the patients are transferred. First, this dissertation suggests that the existing pediatric readiness program may not influence the health and recovery of children with sepsis in the same way it improves survival for other diseases, like injuries. Second, sepsis hospital stays (including survival and the amount of days spent in the hospital) were not different for children that live very close compared to farther from hospitals with pediatric sepsis care. Finally, when older adult sepsis patients need to be transferred from one hospital to a different hospital, most hospitals use the same destination hospitals, and it is unclear if the destination hospitals being used are always the best available option. Overall, these three findings will help to improve how the health system, with many hospitals working together, care for children and older adults with sepsis.