Scholars of the Late Pleistocene in Southern Africa have recently sought to develop models explaining long-term variation between Middle Stone Age and Late Stone Age assemblages in terms of variability between “macrolithic” vs. “microlithic” toolmaking systems associated with shifts in hunter-gatherer ecology and land use patterns. While it has often proven extremely difficult to actually test many models, recently developed methods allow us to do so in novel ways. In this dissertation, I use new archaeological data from excavations of two sites in the Namib Desert, as well as new approaches to sourcing lithic artifacts to examine the hypothesis that contrasts between terminal Pleistocene (ca. 15-20 ka BP) and early Holocene (ca. 6-12 ka BP) occupation phases at the two sites represent adaptive responses primarily driven by changes in fluvial regimes and the resource productivity of riparian corridors. Analyzing the lithic assemblage compositions and locating probable source areas for raw materials suggests that terminal Pleistocene groups likely centered land use strategies more toward upland areas east of the study sites and periodically followed broad riparian corridors into the desert itself. Early Holocene groups expanded their ranges and more intensively targeted resources on the open desert plains, dunes, and beaches of the coastal lowlands. My results suggest environmental change may be partially responsible for driving this shift, but new data and methodological tools are needed to address factors like fluctuations in regional population size that may have been driving shifts in the late Pleistocene record of this unique region of Southern Africa.
Bedtime for the Middle Stone Age: land use, strategic foraging, and lithic technology at the end of the Pleistocene in the Namib Desert, Namibia
Abstract
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Bedtime for the Middle Stone Age: land use, strategic foraging, and lithic technology at the end of the Pleistocene in the Namib Desert, Namibia
- Creators
- Theodore Pearson Marks - University of Iowa
- Contributors
- James G. Enloe (Advisor)Robert G. Franciscus (Committee Member)Matthew E. Hill (Committee Member)E Arthur Bettis III (Committee Member)Grant S. McCall (Committee Member)
- Resource Type
- Dissertation
- Degree Awarded
- Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), University of Iowa
- Degree in
- Anthropology
- Date degree season
- Spring 2018
- DOI
- 10.17077/etd.jvbmzlsp
- Publisher
- University of Iowa
- Number of pages
- xvii, 257 pages
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2018 Theodore Pearson Marks
- Language
- English
- Description illustrations
- color illustrations, color maps
- Description bibliographic
- Includes bibliographical references (pages 241-257).
- Public Abstract (ETD)
From archaeological data, we know that throughout most of the past 200,000 years in Africa, anatomically modern humans lived as hunter-gatherers and depended on surprisingly simple forms of flaked stone tools for their technological needs. During isolated periods, however, certain groups rapidly shifted to more elaborate stone implements before eventually reverting back to simpler forms. Explaining this “seesaw” pattern has recently been a major challenge for archaeologists. Contemporary models have focused on foraging strategies and climatic changes that affected the distribution of food and water resources, altering the demands on subsistence technologies and driving change. This project evaluates the hypothesis that shifts that occurred 10-20,000 years ago between “Middle Stone Age” to “Late Stone Age” tool technologies at two sites in the central Namib desert of Namibia were responses to changes in the patterns of river flow in the desert environment. Using data from excavations and a survey of the locations where people acquired stone to make tools, my research suggests people during early occupation phases of the sites focused their foraging into zones of the landscape around rivers and the inland highlands of modern-day Namibia, with technological systems adapted to these environments. In contrast, later groups faced more challenging conditions and shifted toward more dispersed patterns of land use centered into drier, riskier environmental zones. While my work supports the notion that technological shifts were partially responses to environmental change, the data also point to other factors underlying technological changes that archaeologists have largely been unable to examine.
- Academic Unit
- Anthropology
- Record Identifier
- 9983777077902771