Logo image
Beyond the classroom: How student leaders in Dance Marathon learn across academic and co-curricular contexts
Dissertation

Beyond the classroom: How student leaders in Dance Marathon learn across academic and co-curricular contexts

LaShelle Morrison
University of Iowa
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), University of Iowa
Spring 2026
DOI: 10.25820/etd.008332
pdf
2026-04-28 Morrison LaShelle Dissertation1.82 MB
Embargoed Access, Embargo ends: 06/29/2028

Abstract

Experiential Learning Theory (ELT) suggests that learning is contextual and that individuals adapt their learning patterns in response to different environmental demands. As individuals advance through higher education and experience increased academic specialization, their learning pattern preferences may become less flexible, a process ELT refers to as accentuation. Co-curricular involvement may be a potential context for maintaining or developing learning flexibility. This study examines the context dependency (across both academic and co-curricular contexts) of Dance Marathon student leaders’ learning patterns and flexibility and explores how students describe their learning experiences within each setting. Frequency distributions of learning patterns showed variation across contexts. Descriptively, Abstract Conceptualization and Reflective Observation means fell below the published normative values, while Active Experimentation means exceeded the normative sample in both contexts, highlighting an experience and action-oriented nature consistent with the sample’s co-curricular leadership engagement. Independent sample t-tests revealed no statistically significant differences between contexts for KELP mode scores, composite scores. However, the learning flexibility score differed significantly between contexts (p=0.063), with a higher mean in the co-curricular context (M=0.826) than the academic context (M=0.736). Additionally, the LFI means in both contexts were higher than the normative sample, suggesting a theoretically meaningful trend warranting further investigation with larger samples and potentially longitudinal studies. Qualitative analysis of students reflections developed six integrated themes describing learning across both contexts: (1) learning as a social, relational, and communicative process; (2) skills developing through active engagement, applied practice, and experiential learning; (3) adaptability, self-regulation, and problem-solving developing through challenge and uncertainty; (4) learning as a developmental process involving transitions, growth, and leadership formation; (5) purpose, empathy, and identity as divergent pathways across academic and co-curricular contexts; and (6) tools and organizational structures as learning scaffolds. While themes were integrated, the learning and experiences by participants varied within each theme. Findings suggest that co-curricular participation may cultivate forms of experiential breadth, holistic personal development, and flexible engagement that complement and enrich students’ academic learning. Implications for higher education practice include the value of structured reflective opportunities within action-oriented environments such as co-curriculars and institutional recognition of co-curricular involvement as a source of student learning and development.
Co-Curricular Experiential Learning Learning Flexibility

Details

Metrics

1 Record Views
Logo image