Logo image
Cortical mechanisms of auditory object detection in listeners with and without hearing loss
Dissertation   Open access

Cortical mechanisms of auditory object detection in listeners with and without hearing loss

Nour Alsabbagh
University of Iowa
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), University of Iowa
Spring 2026
pdf
Nour PhD thesis revision2.65 MBDownloadView
Open Access

Abstract

Auditory objects are formed by detecting the regularity of spectrotemporal patterns in sounds. For listeners with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), the degree of spectral degradation and the use of hearing assistive devices, such as cochlear implants (CI) or hearing aids (HA), can make the detection of auditory objects more difficult. Yet it remains unknown how auditory object detection is degraded in these populations, and how neural mechanisms adapt or fail to adapt under different listening configurations. Two studies investigated mechanisms underlying auditory object detection in listeners with SNHL. Study 1 explored neural and behavioral responses to auditory object detection across different listening configurations. Study 2 investigated the effect of frequency composition and residual acoustic hearing on auditory object detection in CI users with electroacoustic stimulation.In Study 1, 20 normal-hearing (NH) listeners, 17 HA users, 31 CI users with electroacoustic stimulation (A+E), and 17 CI users with electric-only stimulation (E-only) participated. The stochastic figure-ground (SFG) stimuli were constructed such that auditory objects were restricted to the electric hearing range provided by the CI, i.e., between 1000 and 8000 Hz. In study 2, 40 CI users with electroacoustic stimulation performed the SFG task, which required detecting coherent tone pips embedded in random-frequency backgrounds. In this SFG paradigm, auditory objects were embedded either in the low-frequency (<500 Hz), high-frequency (>1000 Hz), or broadband (low + high) frequency ranges. Electroencephalography was recorded in all studies while participants performed the task. Analyses focused on task performance, phase-locked responses, and oscillatory power. Study 1 revealed that both CI groups performed worse than NH and HA listeners, although their performance was above chance level. Auditory-evoked responses to auditory objects were weak in HA users and absent in CI users, whereas they were otherwise present in the NH group. Delta and theta oscillatory power were either absent or weak in listeners with SNHL. However, decreases in alpha and beta power were present across all groups to a comparable extent, and individual differences in these responses predicted accuracy. In study 2, CI users showed higher accuracy and faster response times when detecting broadband-frequency objects. Auditory-evoked responses to object emergence were absent in all conditions. Time-frequency responses showed a decrease in alpha and beta power after the emergence of auditory objects, with the effect most pronounced in those with broadband frequency composition. These findings suggest that induced alpha and beta oscillations provide robust neural markers of auditory object detection across hearing configurations, even when evoked responses are degraded or absent in CI users. Additionally, the results indicate that alpha and beta oscillations index the degree of spectral information present in auditory objects. These neural measures can potentially be targeted to improve auditory object detectability in listeners with SNHL, thereby enhancing their listening experience.
Cochlear Implants Acoustics Auditory object detection Cortical oscillations EEG Hearing loss Stochastic figure-ground

Details

Metrics

1 Record Views
Logo image