There is a vast diversity of karyotypes in nature, yet mechanisms that have facilitated such diversity are unclear. Alterations to an organism’s karyotype can have major negative fitness consequences in meiosis through non-disjunction and aneuploidy. Here, I investigated the role of biased segregation in female meiosis, i.e., meiotic drive, as a force that contributes to the evolution of karyotype form. The closely related species pair, Drosophila americana and Drosophila novamexicana, is an exemplar for understanding mechanisms of karyotype evolution. Since their recent divergence nearly half a million years ago, D. americana has evolved two different centromeric fusions: one fusion between the 2nd and 3rd chromosomes (Muller elements C and D), and the other fusion between the X and 4th chromosomes (Muller elements A and B). The 2-3 fusion is fixed in D. americana. However, the X-4 centromeric fusion remains polymorphic within the species. I uncovered biased transmissions for both fused chromosomes in D. americana such that the X-4 fused chromosome was inherited by 57% of the offspring from heterozygous females and the 2-3 chromosome was inherited by 62% of the offspring. Introgression experiments shoed the fused X-4 and the unfused X and 4th chromosomes are segregating at a 50/50 ratio in D. novamexicana. I have isolated the fused X-4 centromeric region as a possible player in the observed meiotic drive. However, the centromere is not sufficient to cause meiotic drive without a secondary factor. I also measured heterochromatin content between the fused and unfused X and 4th homologs. No obvious size differences were uncovered, but possible compositional differences were revealed. This suggests that if the centromere itself is involved in meiotic drive, either differences in the number of centromeres or compositional differences between the centromeres are influencing meiotic drive. Overall, I have identified and characterized meiotic drive as a force driving karyotype evolution in D. americana but appears to be absent in D. novamexicana, and I have begun to dissect the mechanisms of meiotic drive.
Identification and characterization of meiotic drive within the Drosophila virilis subgroup
Abstract
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Identification and characterization of meiotic drive within the Drosophila virilis subgroup
- Creators
- Nicholas Stewart - University of Iowa
- Contributors
- Bryant McAllister (Advisor)Josep Comeron (Committee Member)John Logsdon (Committee Member)Pamela Geyer (Committee Member)Sarit Smolikove (Committee Member)
- Resource Type
- Dissertation
- Degree Awarded
- Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), University of Iowa
- Degree in
- Biology
- Date degree season
- Summer 2017
- DOI
- 10.17077/etd.ktthunfq
- Publisher
- University of Iowa
- Number of pages
- xiv, 175 pages
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2017 Nicholas Stewart
- Language
- English
- Date submitted
- 09/28/2017
- Description illustrations
- color illustrations
- Description bibliographic
- Includes bibliographical references (pages 172-175).
- Public Abstract (ETD)
An organism’s DNA is organized into chromosomes, which are structured to help ensure proper transmission from parent to offspring. Major alterations to these chromosomes can lead to many negative fitness effects, yet there is a vast diversity in chromosome size, shape, and number among, and in some cases within, species. The mechanisms that drive such chromosome diversity are poorly understood. I investigated the role of biased segregation in female meiosis, i.e., meiotic drive, as a force that contributes to the evolution of chromosome form. More specifically, I investigated how biased segregation in females can facilitate the evolution of two acrocentric chromosomes (centromere at one end of the chromosome) fusing together to make one large metacentric (centromere at the center of the chromosome) chromosome. The closely related species pair, Drosophila americana and Drosophila novamexicana, are exemplars for understanding mechanisms of chromosomal evolution. Since their recent divergence (~half million years), D. americana has evolved two different centromeric fusions: one fusion between the 2nd and 3rd chromosomes, and the other fusion between the X and 4th chromosomes. The 2-3 fusion is fixed in D. americana; however, the X-4 centromeric fusion remains polymorphic within the species. We show that heterozygous females, with respect to the X-4 fusion and the 2-3 fusion, show significantly biased transmissions for both the X-4 fusion (57%) and the 2-3 fusion (62%). Yet, in D. novamexicana, there is no meiotic drive for either the fused X-4 or the unfused X and 4th chromosomes. I have also begun to uncover the role of the centromeric regions in the transmission bias. The centromere itself is not sufficient to induce meiotic drive but rather an interaction with a secondary factor which may allow the fused centromeres to exploit meiosis to increase inheritance from mother to offspring. I also measured heterochromatin content between the fused and unfused X and 4th homologs. No obvious size differences were uncovered, but possible compositional differences were revealed. This suggests that if the centromere itself is involved in meiotic drive, the difference in number of centromeres or compositional differences between the centromeres may be factors in meiotic drive. Overall, I have identified and characterized meiotic drive as a force driving karyotype evolution in D. americana, and I have begun dissecting the mechanisms of meiotic drive.
- Academic Unit
- Biology
- Record Identifier
- 9983777000302771