Child maltreatment is a pervasive social and public health problem in the United States. The negative effects of child maltreatment can include poor mental and relational health outcomes. The experience of discrimination has been shown to have many of the same mental and relational health difficulties. Child maltreatment and discrimination are both social health problems that disproportionately affect the most marginalized people in our society (people of color, people with disabilities, LGBT individuals). Complex trauma, or the experience of multiple traumas, has been shown to have worse mental and relational health outcomes then experiencing one type of trauma alone. Feminist theory is a useful framework for studying how those with marginalized identities experience the effects of child maltreatment. Feminist theory argues that it is essential to incorporate an analysis of power to truly capture the experience of complex trauma for people with marginalized identities. The effects of child maltreatment and discrimination have been studied individually, however little is known about the effects of experiencing both. Data from the National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States (MIDUS) biomarker project was used to examine the effect of experiencing both child maltreatment and discrimination. Latent profile analysis was used to create distinct profiles of trauma out of child maltreatment variables and discrimination. A four profile solution was determined to be the best fitting model. The profiles were Low Trauma, Child Maltreatment/Discrimination, Child Maltreatment and Child Maltreatment/ Discrimination High. Analysis of co-variance was then used to determine how each profile of trauma was related to anxiety, depression, family support and family strain. Differences were found among the profiles and the mental health and relational outcomes. Results and clinical implications are discussed.
Implications of discrimination and child maltreatment: a latent profile analysis
Abstract
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Implications of discrimination and child maltreatment: a latent profile analysis
- Creators
- Elizabeth Oshrin Parker - University of Iowa
- Contributors
- Jacob Bird Priest (Advisor)Corinne Peek-Asa (Committee Member)Armeda Wojciak (Committee Member)Gerta Bardhoshi (Committee Member)Noel Estrada-Hernandez (Committee Member)
- Resource Type
- Dissertation
- Degree Awarded
- Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), University of Iowa
- Degree in
- Rehabilitation and Counselor Education
- Date degree season
- Summer 2017
- DOI
- 10.17077/etd.tbixu7xh
- Publisher
- University of Iowa
- Number of pages
- ix, 94 pages
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2017 Elizabeth Oshrin Parker
- Language
- English
- Description illustrations
- color illustrations
- Description bibliographic
- Includes bibliographical references (pages 73-94).
- Public Abstract (ETD)
Both child maltreatment and discrimination are pervasive public health concerns. Both have been shown to have the potential to lead to poor mental and relational health outcomes. These two public health concerns disproportionately affect the most marginalized people in our society (i.e. people of color, people with disabilities, LGBT individuals). It can be important to conceptualize both child maltreatment and discrimination as forms of trauma. Complex trauma is the experience of multiple trauma over the course of a lifetime. Feminist theory would argue that framing discrimination as a type of trauma allows for the focus to be placed on societal ills rather than individual pathology. This study examines the effects of experiencing both child maltreatment and discrimination on the long term outcomes of anxiety, depression, family closeness and family strain. Latent profile analysis was used to create distinct profiles of trauma out of child maltreatment variables and discrimination. A four profile solution was determined to be the best fitting model. The profiles were Low Trauma, Child Maltreatment/Discrimination, Child Maltreatment and Child Maltreatment/ Discrimination High. Analysis of covariance was then used to determine how each profile of trauma was related to anxiety, depression, family support and family strain. Differences were found among the profiles and the mental health and relational outcomes. Results and clinical implications are discussed.
- Academic Unit
- Counselor Education
- Record Identifier
- 9983776623702771