In defense of exploitable information
Abstract
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- In defense of exploitable information
- Creators
- Hyungrae Noh
- Contributors
- Carrie Figdor (Advisor)Richard Fumerton (Committee Member)Gregory Landini (Committee Member)Gualtiero Piccinini (Committee Member)David G Stern (Committee Member)
- Resource Type
- Dissertation
- Degree Awarded
- Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), University of Iowa
- Degree in
- Philosophy
- Date degree season
- Autumn 2019
- DOI
- 10.17077/etd.005248
- Publisher
- University of Iowa
- Number of pages
- xv, 166 pages
- Copyright
- Copyright 2019 Hyungrae Noh
- Language
- English
- Description illustrations
- color illustrations
- Description bibliographic
- Includes bibliographical references (pages 139-153)
- Public Abstract (ETD)
Philosophers generally agree that the capacity to represent things in the world is the mark of the mental. For instance, the fact that I can have a desire to eat pecan pie implies the fact that I am a mental being. To explain human behavior by referring to contents of mental states, such as ‘pecan pie’, is to take semantic properties of mind into psychological explanations. Cognitive scientists refer to contents of states of simple systems (e.g. the bug-catching system of frogs or the chemotactic system of bacteria) to explain animal behavior (i.e. ethological explanations). For instance, microbiologists take the chemotactic swimming of bacteria as the behavioral outcome of processing chemotactic states about ambient chemical concentration so as to decide whether to swim towards chemical attractants or away from chemical repellents. A philosophical question arises: given the similarity between psychological explanations and ethological explanations, for example, does a bacterium has a mind? Cognitive scientists, however, do not have an answer because cognitive science simply takes the existence of semantic properties for granted. The content question has been largely left to philosophy.
In this dissertation, I defend the view that simple organisms do have mind in that there is no metaphysical difference between the existence of semantic properties of the mind of simple organisms and that of human beings.
- Academic Unit
- Philosophy
- Record Identifier
- 9983779899202771