Interpretable explanatory item response models with machine learning
Abstract
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Interpretable explanatory item response models with machine learning
- Creators
- Xiaoting Zhong
- Contributors
- Stephen Dunbar (Advisor)Catherine Welch (Committee Member)Deborah Harris (Committee Member)Kai Wang (Committee Member)
- Resource Type
- Dissertation
- Degree Awarded
- Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), University of Iowa
- Degree in
- Psychological and Quantitative Foundations (Educational Measurement and Statistics)
- Date degree season
- Spring 2026
- DOI
- 10.25820/etd.008346
- Publisher
- University of Iowa
- Number of pages
- xiii, 129 pages
- Copyright
- Copyright 2026 Xiaoting Zhong
- Language
- English
- Date submitted
- 04/28/2026
- Description illustrations
- graphs, tables
- Description bibliographic
- Includes bibliographical references (pages 112-118).
- Public Abstract (ETD)
Educational tests are often used to make important decisions about students, programs, and learning support. Because of this, prediction models used in assessment should be accurate, easy to understand, and fair across different groups of learners. This thesis studies how to improve those models by combining ideas from educational measurement and machine learning.
Traditional psychometric models are useful because they explain how student characteristics and item features relate to performance. However, they may miss complex patterns in real data. Machine learning can detect those patterns, but it often works like a “black box,” making its results harder to interpret. This thesis proposes a hybrid framework, called Explanatory Item Response Models with Machine Learning Integration (EIRM-ML), that brings these two approaches together. The model keeps the clear structure of explanatory item response modeling while adding information learned from machine learning predictions.
The study asks three main questions: whether this hybrid method improves prediction, whether it gives meaningful explanations for why students respond as they do, and whether it supports fairer results across subgroups. To answer these questions, the thesis uses simulation studies and an empirical application based on the Open University Learning Analytics Dataset.
This research contributes a practical way to build assessment models that are more flexible than traditional methods, but still transparent enough for educators, researchers, and decision-makers to trust and use.
- Academic Unit
- Psychological and Quantitative Foundations
- Record Identifier
- 9985176870302771