One hundred sixty-nine of the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) patient outcomes were tested for interrater reliability, criterion validity, and sensitivity. In 10 field sites, ranging from hospitals to home care, pairs of nurses rated the outcome measures for 5 to 130 patients. Inter-class correlations were greater than or equal to 0.70 for 63 outcomes. Pearson's correlations with criterion measures were greater than or equal to 0.60 for 40 outcomes and from 0.39 to 0.60 for 43 additional ones. Change scores for 99 outcomes ranged from 0 to 2.0 from first to second and second to third rating. Most NOC measures demonstrated good inter-rater reliability, substantial criterion validity, and sensitivity to change. More testing and thorough training of nurses using NOC outcomes are needed.
Journal article
Evaluation of the reliability and validity of nursing outcomes classification patient outcomes and measures
Journal of nursing measurement, Vol.11(2), pp.97-117
01/01/2003
DOI: 10.1891/1061-3749.11.2.97
PMID: 15274520
Abstract
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Evaluation of the reliability and validity of nursing outcomes classification patient outcomes and measures
- Creators
- Meridean Maas - University of IowaMarion Johnson - University of Iowa, NursingSue Moorhead - University of IowaDavid ReedSharon Sweeney - University of Iowa
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Journal of nursing measurement, Vol.11(2), pp.97-117
- DOI
- 10.1891/1061-3749.11.2.97
- PMID
- 15274520
- ISSN
- 1061-3749
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 01/01/2003
- Academic Unit
- Nursing
- Record Identifier
- 9983557132102771
Metrics
47 Record Views