Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are nicotine delivery devices that became popular with youth who never smoked. This eventually grew into a “youth vaping epidemic.” When an outbreak of mysterious illnesses in 2019 in the U.S. became known as “e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury” (EVALI), it highlighted how little was known about these products. Our overall goal was to investigate a popular brand of e-cigarette (JUUL) for its potential to contribute to lung inflammation. We used mice as models that translate into young never-smokers, pregnant women, asthmatic individuals, and EVALI patients. Aerosols from the two flavors we tested contain high concentrations (>100 million/cm3) of small particles, with Virginia Tobacco and Menthol particles having similarly small diameters of 108 (2.1) nm and 113 (2.2) nm, respectively. Overall, both short-term and long-term exposures to 5% nicotine strength Virginia Tobacco and Menthol flavors did not elicit overt lung inflammation nor increased cell death nor impaired lung function. However, in the short-term exposure with male mice, both flavors caused responses in the lungs that implied an increased antioxidant response. In the pregnancy model, there was no increased lung inflammation, but liver and placenta data suggested altered lipid and estrogen metabolism and signaling. Compared to pregnant control mice, liver gene expression of five enzymes and inflammatory markers were higher in Virginia Tobacco-exposed pregnant mice. Gene expression of one of these (called Fasn) was also higher in placentas, but more so in Menthol-exposed mice. Reproductive and fetal outcomes were worse in Virginia Tobacco-exposed mice, in comparison to sham and Menthol groups. Altogether, the two flavors had different impacts, and the influence of pregnancy made the effects stronger for some outcomes. In the asthma model combined with Menthol exposure, lung inflammation and function were impacted differently depending on sex. Whereas the male asthma model had more inflammatory cells and potentially more mucus in the lungs with the addition of vaping, females did not. However, the female asthma model with vaping displayed alterations in lung function that suggest an adverse impact, whereas males did not. Other measures of asthma severity did not worsen with the addition of vaping. Together, these data suggest changes in lung inflammation, mucus secretion, and lung function in response to short-term exposure to Menthol, which could potentially worsen asthma symptoms in a sex-dependent manner. In the EVALI model, inhaled aerosolized vitamin E acetate induced clinical features consistent with EVALI, such as increased lung inflammation and impaired lung function. In the lungs, vitamin E acetate exposure greatly increased pro-inflammatory cytokines and increased cell death and worsened lung function. Findings were consistent across two different mouse models and correspond to symptoms seen in patients (i.e., lipid-laden macrophages). We also found a systemic increase of a harmful marker related to lipid damage. Altogether, this provides additional evidence to support vitamin E acetate as a culprit in the EVALI crisis. Although the public health potential for e-cigarettes has yet to be established, the health ramifications for young never-smokers have become clearer, but more independent research on e-cigarette toxicity is still needed to fill the current knowledge gaps.