Logo image
Targeting resistance mechanisms with selenium compounds in the treatment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Dissertation   Open access

Targeting resistance mechanisms with selenium compounds in the treatment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Aseel Owayed Awad Rataan
University of Iowa
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), University of Iowa
Autumn 2023
DOI: 10.25820/etd.006849
pdf
Aseel's Dissertation-final version3.84 MBDownloadView
Open Access Free to read and download

Abstract

ccRCC poses a significant global health challenge as its incidence continues to rise, resulting in a substantial annual mortality rate. ccRCC tumors are highly immunogenic and show resistance to conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The treatment landscape for ccRCC has been revolutionized by the discovery of antiangiogenic TKIs and ICIs. Nonetheless, even in initially responding patients, resistance to these therapies eventually emerges. Resistance (intrinsic and acquired), lack of durable response, serious adverse events, and cost represent major clinical challenges and underline the need to identify additional ‘druggable’ targets. Identifying and targeting resistance biomarkers in ccRCC is a hot area of research, with the goal of enhancing the effectiveness of existing treatments and mitigating resistance, ultimately improving patient outcomes and quality of life. Utilizing cost-effective and safe compounds like selenium to target resistance biomarkers is of utmost importance in optimizing ccRCC therapeutics. In ccRCC, TGF-β1 plays a pivotal role in driving the transition from epithelial non-sarcomatoid to dedifferentiated sarcomatoid ccRCC, associated with increased aggressiveness and metastatic potential. Additionally, PD-L1 and VEGF play roles in the pathogenesis of ccRCC, and they are overexpressed in ccRCC cell lines with and without sarcomatoid differentiation. These biomarkers are associated with immune evasion, drug resistance, and increased tumor angiogenesis. Studies were carried out to evaluate the in vitro effect of nontoxic concentrations of MSA and the in vivo effect of the therapeutic doses of SLM on the expression levels of TGF-β1, PD-L1, and VEGF in ccRCC cell lines, and patient tumor biopsies. Various ccRCC cell lines were evaluated for their expression of TGF-β1, PD-L1, and VEGF. The 786-O, RCJ41T1, RCJ41T2, and RCJ41M cells were picked up for further investigation. An examination of the interaction between MSA and TGF-β1 was conducted through a simple mixing experiment and a CETSA, revealing a direct and specific interaction between MSA and TGF-β1. Subsequently, the effect of MSA on TGF-β1 expression was explored with varying doses and exposure times, demonstrating a dose- and time-dependent downregulation in the expression of TGF-β1, PD-L1, and VEGF. In light of these findings, the relationship between TGF-β1 and PD-L1/VEGF expression was investigated by creating a TGF-β1 KO cell line. Initially, the created TGF-β1 KO cell line was characterized in terms of growth rate and TGF-β1, PD-L1, VEGF, and HIF-2α expression. Growth curve analysis indicated that the parental cells exhibited notably faster growth compared to the TGF-β1 KO cells, which is in line with expectations as TGF-β1 is considered to be a growth factor. Regarding the expression of the biomarkers, it was shown a decrease in TGF-β1 expression, with no change in the expression of PD-L1 and VEGF after 3 days of selection. However, after 7 days of selection, a complete KO of TGF-β1 led to a downregulation of PD-L1 VEGF and HIF-2α expression, confirming the role of TGF-β1 as an upstream regulator of PD-L1, VEGF and HIF-2α. The effect of MSA treatment on TGF-β1, PD-L1, and VEGF expression in the KO cells was also examined, revealing an unexpected upregulation of PD-L1 and VEGF. One possible explanation of this phenomenon is the activation of alternative pathways, such as PI3K/Akt/mTOR, resulting in an increase in HIFs expression, subsequently leading to higher PD-L1 and VEGF levels. Moreover, the effect of MSA, axitinib, and the combination on the ccRCC cell lines viability was tested showing an additive antiproliferative effect of the combination. Finally, SLM was used to test the effect of its addition on axitinib in the treatment of ccRCC nude mice xenograft model. The in vivo results showed no difference between the axitinib-treated group and the combination group. Further investigation revealed that the in vivo results may have been subject to artifacts due to inappropriate preparation and mixing of the drugs prior to administration. A repeat of the in vivo experiment with separate administration and fresh preparation of the medication will be conducted in the future. Additionally, the importance of oncogenic and tumor suppressor microRNA as resistance biomarkers in ccRCC has been investigated. The expression of various microRNAs in ccRCC and human biopsies was identified. Similarly, the expression of the same microRNAs has been also identified and compared in untreated patient kidney samples and patient kidney samples after being treated with SLM and currently available therapeutics for ccRCC including ipilimumab, nivolumab, axitinib, pembrolizumab, and cabozantinib. The results revealed higher expression levels of miRNA-210, -155, and -34a in the untreated compared to the treated tissue, however, no definitive conclusion could be drawn from this experiment because the treated and the untreated tissues were not obtained from the same patients. In conclusion, the addition of selenium compounds to standard-of-care treatment of ccRCC such as axitinib showed an additive antiproliferative effect in vitro and has the potential to exhibit synergistic effects in animal experiments, through downregulation of resistance biomarkers including TGF-β1, PD-L1, and VEGF.
clear cell renal cell carcinoma methylselenic acid programmed death- ligand 1 seleno-l-methionine transforming growth factor-beta vascular endothelial growth factor

Details

Metrics

1 File views/ downloads
58 Record Views
Logo image