Logo image
“When treatments mimic the eating disorder, it gives patients this idea that recovery or freedom could look a little bit like the captivity that they’re used to.”: Exploring the meaning of surveillance in eating disorder treatment.
Dissertation   Open access

“When treatments mimic the eating disorder, it gives patients this idea that recovery or freedom could look a little bit like the captivity that they’re used to.”: Exploring the meaning of surveillance in eating disorder treatment.

Madeline J Hunsicker
University of Iowa
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), University of Iowa
Summer 2025
DOI: 10.25820/etd.008094
pdf
Dissertation Hunsicker May2024423.36 kBDownloadView
Open Access Free to read and download

Abstract

The sociocultural model of eating disorders points to the internalization of social policing and pressure as a primary mechanism of Anorexia nervosa. Scholars in support of this model have critiqued the ways that existing eating disorder treatment may led to a further internalization of monitoring practices taught in treatment. Eating disorder treatment may include residential and/or inpatient care, which typically offer 24/7 monitoring and supervision of patients. This monitoring may include physical monitoring at meals, as well as therapy protocols that teach patients thought recording. This study explores how individuals who have attended inpatient and/or residential treatment for Anorexia nervosa understand, and make meaning, around the presence of monitoring practices in treatment. In this study, participants were invited to share how they experienced monitoring in treatment, the role of monitoring in their recovery, and their understanding of monitoring practices and eating disorders more broadly. Participants described how monitoring in treatment defined what was and wasn’t an eating disorder, how monitoring practices taught in dietary and therapy reinforced eating disorder behaviors, and how being surveilled in treatment felt dehumanizing and silencing of their voice. They also described how monitoring in treatment reinforced treatment goals of compliance, instead of developing skills for, and dreams of, recovery beyond the eating disorder. Finally, participants described a need for more individualized and compassionate treatment. These results highlight how monitoring taught and enforced in treatment replicates monitoring practices of the eating disorder, is dehumanizing, and interferes with individuals’ ability to prepare and be in recovery.
Eating Disorders Psychology anorexia surveillance

Details

Metrics

10 Record Views
Logo image