Logo image
A method to determine percent crystalline silica by mass of bulk dust using polarized light microscopy
Thesis   Open access

A method to determine percent crystalline silica by mass of bulk dust using polarized light microscopy

Matthew Saylor
University of Iowa
Master of Science (MS), University of Iowa
Spring 2026
DOI: 10.25820/etd.008290
pdf
Saylor_Thesis948.99 kBDownloadView
Open Access Free to read and download

Abstract

Crystalline silica is a Group 1 human carcinogen that causes silicosis, lung cancer, and other chronic diseases in workers across mining, construction, and foundry industries. Current standard methods for quantifying crystalline silica in bulk dust include X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) and Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The methods are accurate but require expensive instrumentation, extensive sample preparation, and laboratory settings that limit accessibility in field or low-resource settings. This study developed and compared a polarized light microscopy (PLM) method as a rapid, low-cost alternative for quantifying crystalline silica mass percentage in bulk dust samples. The method uses PLM imaging paired with ImageJ and a custom Python script to extract particle area, circularity, and RGB values, which were used to calculate equivalent-volume diameter, birefringence, and estimated particle mass. Particles with birefringence within ±0.0016 of 0.004 as concluded by a sensitivity analysis, were classified as crystalline silica, and their mass fraction of total particle mass was reported as percent crystalline silica. The method was evaluated against four bulk dusts: talc, feldspar, amorphous silica, and Arizona Road Dust. The talc, feldspar, and amorphous silica were mixed at known ratios with Min-U-Sil® 5 quartz. PLM results were compared to the gravimetric bulk mixes and to XRD and FTIR analyses. A paired t-test showed PLM and gravimetric values agreed for two of the four dust mixtures. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc testing revealed significant differences among all method pairs except PLM versus gravimetric. When stratified, PLM agrees with the gravimetric mixes more than the other analytical methods. The PLM method can offer a promising alternative that is inexpensive, rapid, and accurate. Future research can adapt to filter-based respirable samples, implement with a mobile microscopy method, and generally improve the equipment for improved accuracy and precision.
Analytical Chemistry Bulk analysis Crystalline Silica Polarized Light Microscopy

Details

Metrics

2 File views/ downloads
10 Record Views
Logo image