Logo image
Evaluation of the effect of fluoride topical agents on the prevention of demineralization adjacent to glass ionomer restoration In vitro
Thesis   Open access

Evaluation of the effect of fluoride topical agents on the prevention of demineralization adjacent to glass ionomer restoration In vitro

Yun Jung Kim
University of Iowa
Master of Science (MS), University of Iowa
Autumn 2021
DOI: 10.17077/etd.006238
pdf
MS Thesis final submission-Yun Kim -39.88 MBDownloadView
Open Access Free to read and download

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to determine whether the silver diamine fluoride agent (SDF) effectively prevents secondary caries on glass ionomer type of restorations as compared to sodium fluoride (NaF) varnish.Methods: A total of 45 molar teeth with non-carious roots were prepared for a class V cavity lesion (4x2x2 mm). The specimens were allocated to 9 different groups: group 1, Fuji II LC® restoration; group 2, Fuji II LC® restoration followed by 38% SDF; group 3, Fuji II LC® restoration followed by 5% NaF varnish; group 4, Equia Forte® restoration; group 5, Equia Forte® restoration followed by 38% SDF; group 6, Equia Forte® followed by 5% NaF varnish; group 7, Equia Forte® restoration with resin coating; group 8, Equia Forte® restoration with resin coating followed by 38% SDF; group 9, Equia Forte® with resin coating followed by 5% NaF varnish. Samples were immersed in S. mutans and L. casei in MRS medium + 5% sucrose to develop a biofilm. Subsequently, the MRS medium was replenished daily and incubated at 37°C for 8 days. Polarized light microscope was used to measure demineralization. The deepest point of the lesion adjacent to the restoration of the tooth surface was measured from the images captured by the polarized light microscope. With demineralization depth as the outcome measure, Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the median depth measurements between 10 different groups. Dunn tests were used for pairwise comparison. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the measurements for the three restorative materials. The lesion depth was less in restorations with SDF and NaF than those without SDF and NaF agents. Conclusions: The SDF and NaF could provide long-term antibacterial activity and potentially extend the longevity of the restorations and avoid repair or replacement of restorations.
public abstract

Details

Metrics

2 File views/ downloads
141 Record Views
Logo image