Journal article
A Comparison of the Aided Performance and Benefit Provided by a Linear and a Two-Channel Wide Dynamic Range Compression Hearing Aid
Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, Vol.42(1), pp.65-79
02/01/1999
DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4201.65
PMID: 10025544
Abstract
The aided performance and benefit achieved with linear and two-channel wide dynamic range compression (WDRC) in-the-canal (ITC) hearing aids were established in 55 individuals. Study participants had been wearing either linear or adaptive-frequency-response (Bass Increase at Low Levels, BILL) ITC hearing aids for approximately one year before participation in this study. Outcome measures included aided performance and objective benefit in quiet and noise at a variety of speech levels (50, 60, and 75 dB SPL), at various levels of babble background (quiet, signal-to-babble ratios of +5 and +10 dB), and for various types of test materials (monosyllabic words and sentences in connected speech). Several subjective measures of aided performance (sound-quality judgments and magnitude estimates of listening effort) and relative benefit (improvement in listening effort and the Hearing Aid Performance Inventory, HAPI) were also obtained. Finally, self-report measures of hearing-aid use were also obtained using daily logs. Participants completed all outcome measures for the linear ITC hearing aids first, following 2 months of usage, and then repeated all outcome measures for the WDRC instruments after a subsequent 2-month period of use.
In general, although both types of hearing aids demonstrated significant benefit, the results indicated that the WDRC instruments were superior to the linear devices for many of the outcome measures. This tended to be the case most frequently when low speech levels were used. Many of the performance differences between devices most likely can be ascribed to differences in gain, and prescriptive approaches (DSL[i/o] vs. NAL-R), for the fixed volume control testing performed in this study.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- A Comparison of the Aided Performance and Benefit Provided by a Linear and a Two-Channel Wide Dynamic Range Compression Hearing Aid
- Creators
- Larry E. Humes - Indiana University BloomingtonLaurel Christensen - Department of Communication Disorders LSU Medical Center Baton Rouge, LATara Thomas - Department of Communication Disorders LSU Medical Center Baton Rouge, LAFred H. Bess - Vanderbilt UniversityAndrea Hedley-Williams - Vanderbilt UniversityRuth Bentler - University of Iowa
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, Vol.42(1), pp.65-79
- DOI
- 10.1044/jslhr.4201.65
- PMID
- 10025544
- ISSN
- 1092-4388
- eISSN
- 1558-9102
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 02/01/1999
- Academic Unit
- Communication Sciences and Disorders
- Record Identifier
- 9984383297802771
Metrics
18 Record Views