Logo image
A Randomized Comparison of Medication and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Treating Depression in Low-Income Young Minority Women
Journal article   Open access

A Randomized Comparison of Medication and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Treating Depression in Low-Income Young Minority Women

Hyunkeun Cho, Sang Joon Son, Sanghee Kim and Jungsik Park
Medical science monitor, Vol.22, pp.4947-4953
12/16/2016
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.902206
PMCID: PMC5189608
PMID: 27981956
url
https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.902206View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND Longitudinal data arise frequently in biomedical science and health studies where each subject is repeatedly measured over time. We compared the effectiveness of medication and cognitive behavioral therapy on depression in predominantly low-income young minority women. MATERIAL AND METHODS The treatment effects on patients with low-level depression may differ from the treatment effects on patients with high-level depression. We used a quantile regression model for longitudinal data analysis to determine which treatment is most beneficial for patients at different stress levels over time. RESULTS The results confirm that both treatments are effective in reducing the depression score over time, regardless of the depression level. CONCLUSIONS Compared to cognitive behavioral therapy, treatment with medication more often effective, although the size of the effect differs. Thus, no matter how severe a patient's depression symptoms are, antidepressant medication is effective in decreasing depression symptoms.
United States Minority Groups Cognitive Behavioral Therapy - economics Poverty Age Factors Humans Depressive Disorder - drug therapy Antidepressive Agents - therapeutic use Young Adult Cognitive Behavioral Therapy - methods Depressive Disorder - economics Antidepressive Agents - economics Adult Depressive Disorder - therapy Female Referral and Consultation Longitudinal Studies

Details

Metrics

Logo image