Journal article
A Reply to Clark Wolf, Elizabeth Edenberg, and Helga Varden
Dialogue - Canadian Philosophical Association, Vol.62(2), pp.261-277
08/2023
DOI: 10.1017/S001221732200035X
Appears in UI Libraries Support Open Access
Abstract
In this article, I respond to symposium articles by Clark Wolf, Elizabeth Edenberg, and Helga Varden. With shared sympathies for anti-oppression liberalism and social contract theory, they urge me to develop the theory of liberal dependency care (LDC) in new directions — respectively, as a form of subject-centered justice, with a political liberal justification, and with a Kantian foundation for ‘private right.’ I respond by explicating the inclusivity that is built into the arrow of care map and the variety of contract theory I advance. Furthermore, I insist that anti-oppression liberalism need not formulate its claims in political liberal terms.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- A Reply to Clark Wolf, Elizabeth Edenberg, and Helga Varden
- Creators
- Asha Leena Bhandary - University of Iowa
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Dialogue - Canadian Philosophical Association, Vol.62(2), pp.261-277
- DOI
- 10.1017/S001221732200035X
- ISSN
- 0012-2173
- eISSN
- 1759-0949
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Number of pages
- 17
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 08/2023
- Academic Unit
- Gender, Women's and Sexuality Studies; Philosophy
- Record Identifier
- 9984476552702771
Metrics
83 Record Views