Logo image
A quantitative assessment of efficacy of various calcium hydroxide removal techniques
Journal article   Peer reviewed

A quantitative assessment of efficacy of various calcium hydroxide removal techniques

David M Kenee, John D Allemang, James D Johnson, John Hellstein and Brian K Nichol
Journal of endodontics, Vol.32(6), pp.563-565
06/2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.065
PMID: 16728252

View Online

Abstract

This study evaluated the amount of calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH)(2))] remaining in canals after removal with various techniques including combinations of NaOCl with EDTA irrigation, hand filing, rotary instrumentation, or ultrasonics. The mesial canals of 12 mandibular molars were uniformly instrumented. Teeth were sectioned longitudinally along the length of the instrumented canals. Acrylic jigs were fabricated, allowing reapproximation of the opposing segments. After Ca(OH)2 placement into the canals, four techniques were used for its removal. In the first method, the master apical file was placed to working length in between two 5-ml rinses of NaOCl. The other three techniques combined with the first method either a 2.5-ml EDTA rinse, a rotary file (MAF size) to working length, or passive ultrasonication. Results showed that no technique removed all Ca(OH)2. Rotary and ultrasonic techniques, while not different from each other, removed significantly more Ca(OH)2 than irrigant only techniques. The irrigant only techniques were not different from each other.
Root Canal Irrigants - administration & dosage Calcium Hydroxide Humans Root Canal Therapy - instrumentation

Details

Metrics

Logo image