Logo image
A randomised controlled trial of radial artery cannulation guided by Doppler vs. palpation vs. ultrasound
Journal article   Open access

A randomised controlled trial of radial artery cannulation guided by Doppler vs. palpation vs. ultrasound

K Ueda, E O Bayman, C Johnson, N J Odum and J Jy Lee
Anaesthesia, Vol.70(9), pp.1039-1044
09/2015
DOI: 10.1111/anae.13062
PMID: 25857597
url
https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.13062View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

We randomly allocated 749 participants to radial artery cannulation by anaesthetic trainees, guided by Doppler (244), palpation (256) or ultrasound (249). Ultrasound increased the rate of cannulation at the first attempt by 14% (95% CI 5-22%), from 39% with Doppler or palpation, p = 0.002 for both. There were no differences in the rates of cannulation 5 min after the procedure started: 147/244 (60%) with Doppler; 160/256 (63%) with palpation; and 171/249 (69%) with ultrasound, p = 0.13.
Catheterization, Peripheral - methods Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods Ultrasonography, Doppler - statistics & numerical data Ultrasonography, Doppler - methods Palpation - methods Palpation - statistics & numerical data Humans Catheterization, Peripheral - statistics & numerical data Ultrasonography, Interventional - statistics & numerical data Female Male Radial Artery - diagnostic imaging

Details

Logo image