A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of prophylactic topical antibiotics for the prevention of uncomplicated wound infections

Qiao-Jing Tong; Kimberly Dp Hammer; Erika M Johnson; Milagros Zegarra; Michihiko Goto; Tze Shien Lo

doi:10.2147/IDR.S151293

Back

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of prophylactic topical antibiotics for the prevention of uncomplicated wound infections

Journal article

Open access

Peer reviewed

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of prophylactic topical antibiotics for the prevention of uncomplicated wound infections

Qiao-Jing Tong, Kimberly Dp Hammer, Erika M Johnson, Milagros Zegarra, Michihiko Goto and Tze Shien Lo

Infection and drug resistance, Vol.11, pp.417-425

2018

DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S151293

PMCID: PMC5858851

PMID: 29588605

Files and links (1)

url

https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S151293View

Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

The prescription of topical antibiotics for the prevention of infections in uncomplicated wounds is common. However, the efficacy is not well reported. Therefore, the objective of the study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available evidence on prevention of uncomplicated wound infections by prophylactic topical antibiotics. The search included Pubmed, Google Scholar, SCOPUS, Embase, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, National Technical Information Service, and the National Guidelines Clearinghouse. We identified eight randomized controlled trials and four quasi-randomized trials that met the criteria for the systematic review. Of these trials, 11 studies were pooled for meta-analysis to compare the effects of topical antibiotics versus placebo and 4 studies were pooled for comparison of effects of topical antibiotics versus topical antiseptics on uncomplicated wounds. Fewer wound infections occurred in the topical antibiotic arms compared to placebo (pooled risk ratio: 0.57 [95% CI: 0.37 to 0.86]; =0.01 and pooled risk difference: -3.1% [95% CI: -5.8% to -0.34%]; =0.03). Compared to antiseptics, topical antibiotics demonstrated statistically significant relative risk reduction (pooled risk ratio: 0.56 [95% CI: 0.23 to 0.91]; =0.02), while there was no significant absolute risk reduction (pooled risk difference: -3.7% [95% CI: -7.9% to +0.6%]; =0.09). Topical antibiotics are effective in reducing wound infections after surgical procedures, but the absolute benefit is small. Given the global emergence of antimicrobial resistance, judicious use of antibiotics is encouraged and use of antiseptics should be considered as a reasonable alternative to topical antibiotics.

topical antibiotics

prevention

wound infections

Details

Title: Subtitle: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of prophylactic topical antibiotics for the prevention of uncomplicated wound infections
Creators: Qiao-Jing Tong - Department of Infection Control, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Kimberly Dp Hammer - Department of Internal Medicine, University of North Dakota, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Fargo, ND, USA
Erika M Johnson - Library Resources, University of North Dakota, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Fargo, ND, USA
Milagros Zegarra - Department of Internal Medicine, University of North Dakota, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Fargo, ND, USA
Michihiko Goto - Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
Tze Shien Lo - Infectious Disease Service, Fargo VA Health Care System, Fargo, ND, USA
Resource Type: Journal article
Publication Details: Infection and drug resistance, Vol.11, pp.417-425
DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S151293
PMID: 29588605
PMCID: PMC5858851
NLM abbreviation: Infect Drug Resist
ISSN: 1178-6973
eISSN: 1178-6973
Language: English
Date published: 2018
Academic Unit: Infectious Diseases; Internal Medicine
Record Identifier: 9984094769202771

Metrics

38 Record Views

14 Times Cited - Web of Science