Logo image
Accuracy and reliability of qualitative echocardiography assessment of right ventricular size and function in neonates
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Accuracy and reliability of qualitative echocardiography assessment of right ventricular size and function in neonates

Aisling Smith, Jyothsna R Purna, Michael P Castaldo, Daniel Ibarra-Rios, Regan E Giesinger, Danielle R Rios, Dany E Weisz, Amish Jain, Afif F El-Khuffash and Patrick J McNamara
Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.), Vol.36(7), pp.1346-1352
07/2019
DOI: 10.1111/echo.14409
PMCID: PMC6685067
PMID: 31246348
url
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6685067View
Open Access

Abstract

Subjective assessment of right ventricular (RV) function by neonatal echocardiography lacks validation. Incorrect diagnostic assignment in patients with suspected pulmonary hypertension (PH) may lead to unnecessary treatment or missed treatment opportunities. Six evaluators (experts [n = 3], novice [n = 3]) were asked to independently rate RV characteristics (global function, dilation, and septal flattening) based on standardized echocardiography images. We randomly selected 60 infants, ≥35 weeks gestation at birth, of whom 30 were clinically unwell with acute pulmonary hypertension (aPH) and 30 were healthy controls. aPH was defined by echocardiography presence of right-left shunting across transitional shunts or elevated right ventricular systolic pressure as estimated by the magnitude of the regurgitant jet across the tricuspid valve with impaired oxygenation. Inter-rater comparative evaluation within groups and between groups was performed using Kappa statistics. Global agreement between evaluators for subjective assessment of RV function (0.3 [0.03], P < 0.001), size (0.14 [0.02], P < 0.001), and septal flattening (0.2 [0.02], P < 0.001) was uniformly poor. Agreement in RV function assessment was marginally better for both expert (0.32 [0.08], P < 0.001 vs 0.13 [0.081], and P < 0.001) and novice (0.4 [0.08], P < 0.001 vs 0.06 [0.07], and P < 0.001) evaluators. Overall, the diagnosis of aPH vs control was misclassified in 18% of cases. This study demonstrated significant variability in qualitative assessment of RV size and function by trained evaluators, regardless of level of expertise attained. The reliability of objective measures of RV hemodynamics requires prospective evaluation.
Reproducibility of Results Humans Echocardiography - methods Hypertension, Pulmonary - physiopathology Female Male Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging Case-Control Studies Infant, Newborn

Details

Metrics

Logo image