Logo image
Back
Accuracy and replicability of identifying eyelid tremor as an indicator of recent cannabis smoking
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Accuracy and replicability of identifying eyelid tremor as an indicator of recent cannabis smoking

George Sam Wang, Michael Kosnett, Prem Subramanian, Julia Wrobel, Ming Ma, Tim Brown, L Cinnamon Bidwell and Ashley Brooks-Russell
Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.), Vol.62(1), pp.10-18
2024
DOI: 10.1080/15563650.2024.2310154
PMCID: PMC11019859
PMID: 38421358
url
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11019859/pdf/nihms-1978129.pdfView
Open Access

Abstract

Cannabis intoxication may increase the risk of motor vehicle crashes. However, reliable methods of assessing cannabis intoxication are limited. The presence of eyelid tremors is among the signs of cannabis use identified under the Drug Evaluation and Classification Program of the International Association of Chiefs of Police. Our objectives were to assess the accuracy and replicability of identifying eyelid tremor as an indicator of recent cannabis smoking using a blinded, controlled study design. Adult subjects (  = 103) were recruited into three groups based on their cannabis use history: daily, occasional, and no current cannabis use. Participants' closed eyelids were video recorded for 30 seconds by infrared videography goggles before and at a mean ± standard deviation time of 71.4 ± 4.6 minutes after the onset of a 15-minute interval of cannabis flower smoking or vaping. Three observers with expertise in neuro-ophthalmology and medical toxicology were trained on exemplar videos of eyelids to reach a consensus on how to grade eyelid tremor. Without knowledge of subjects' cannabis use history or time point (pre- or post-smoking), observers reviewed each video for eyelid tremor graded as absent, slight, moderate, or severe. During subsequent data analysis, this score was further dichotomized as a consensus score of absent (absent/slight) or present (moderate/severe). Kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient statistics demonstrated moderate agreement among the coders, which ranged from 0.44-0.45 and 0.58-0.61, respectively. There was no significant association between recent cannabis use and the observers' consensus assessment that eyelid tremor was present, and cannabis users were less likely to have tremors (odds ratio: 0.75; 95 percent confidence interval: 0.25, 2.40). The assessment of eyelid tremor as an indicator of recent cannabis smoking had a sensitivity of 0.86, specificity of 0.18, and accuracy of 0.64. Eyelid tremor has fair sensitivity but poor specificity and accuracy for identification of recent cannabis use. Inter-rater reliability for assessment of eyelid tremor was moderate for the presence and degree of tremor. The weak association between recent cannabis use and eyelid tremor does not support its utility in identifying recent cannabis use. Videos were recorded at only one time point after cannabis use. Adherence to abstinence could not be strictly supervised. Due to regulatory restrictions, we were unable to control the cannabis product used or administer a fixed Δ -tetrahydrocannabinol dose. Participants were predominately non-Hispanic and White. In a cohort of participants with a range of cannabis use histories, acute cannabis smoking was not associated with the presence of eyelid tremor, regardless of cannabis use history, at 70 minutes post-smoking. Additional research is needed to identify the presence of eyelid tremor accurately, determine the relationship between cannabis dose and timeline in relation to last cannabis use to eyelid tremor, and determine how it should be, if at all, utilized for cannabis Drug Recognition Evaluator examinations.
 Adult Cannabis Eyelids - drug effects Hallucinogens Humans Marijuana Abuse - diagnosis Marijuana Smoking Reproducibility of Results Substance Abuse Detection - methods Tremor - chemically induced Tremor - diagnosis

Details

Metrics

19 Record Views
1 Times Cited - Web of Science
Logo image