Logo image
An International Study of Factors Affecting Variability of Dosimetry Calculations, Part 3: Contribution from Calculating Absorbed Dose from Time-Integrated Activity
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

An International Study of Factors Affecting Variability of Dosimetry Calculations, Part 3: Contribution from Calculating Absorbed Dose from Time-Integrated Activity

Julia Brosch-Lenz, Sara Kurkowska, Eric Frey, Yuni K Dewaraja, John Sunderland and Carlos Uribe
The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978), Vol.65(8), pp.1166-1172
07/03/2024
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.267293
PMCID: PMC11294060
PMID: 38960715
url
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.267293View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Image-based dosimetry-guided radiopharmaceutical therapy has the potential to personalize treatment by limiting toxicity to organs at risk and maximizing the therapeutic effect. The 177Lu dosimetry challenge of the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging consisted of 5 tasks assessing the variability in the dosimetry workflow. The fifth task investigated the variability associated with the last step, dose conversion, of the dosimetry workflow on which this study is based. Methods: Reference variability was assessed by 2 medical physicists using different software, methods, and all possible combinations of input segmentation formats and time points as provided in the challenge. General descriptive statistics for absorbed dose values from the global submissions from participants were calculated, and variability was measured using the quartile coefficient of dispersion. Results: For the liver, which included lesions with high uptake, variabilities of up to 36% were found. The baseline analysis showed a variability of 29% in absorbed dose results for the liver from datasets where lesions included and excluded were grouped, indicating that variation in how lesions in normal liver were treated was a significant source of variability. For other organs and lesions, variability was within 7%, independently of software used except for the local deposition method. Conclusion: The choice of dosimetry method or software had a small contribution to the overall variability of dose estimates.Image-based dosimetry-guided radiopharmaceutical therapy has the potential to personalize treatment by limiting toxicity to organs at risk and maximizing the therapeutic effect. The 177Lu dosimetry challenge of the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging consisted of 5 tasks assessing the variability in the dosimetry workflow. The fifth task investigated the variability associated with the last step, dose conversion, of the dosimetry workflow on which this study is based. Methods: Reference variability was assessed by 2 medical physicists using different software, methods, and all possible combinations of input segmentation formats and time points as provided in the challenge. General descriptive statistics for absorbed dose values from the global submissions from participants were calculated, and variability was measured using the quartile coefficient of dispersion. Results: For the liver, which included lesions with high uptake, variabilities of up to 36% were found. The baseline analysis showed a variability of 29% in absorbed dose results for the liver from datasets where lesions included and excluded were grouped, indicating that variation in how lesions in normal liver were treated was a significant source of variability. For other organs and lesions, variability was within 7%, independently of software used except for the local deposition method. Conclusion: The choice of dosimetry method or software had a small contribution to the overall variability of dose estimates.
radiopharmaceutical therapy dosimetry variability standardization dosimetry challenge

Details

Metrics

Logo image