Journal article
Analysis of Intracorporeal Compared with Extracorporeal Urinary Diversion After Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy: Results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium
European urology, Vol.65(2), pp.340-347
02/2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.042
PMID: 24183419
Abstract
Intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) has the potential benefits of a smaller incision, reduced pain, decreased bowel exposure, and reduced risk of fluid imbalance.
To compare the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing extracorporeal urinary diversion (ECUD) and ICUD following robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC).
We reviewed the database of the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium (IRCC) (18 international centers), with 935 patients who had undergone RARC and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) between 2003 and 2011.
All patients within the IRCC underwent RARC and PLND as indicated. The urinary diversion was performed either intracorporeally or extracorporeally.
Demographic data, perioperative outcomes, and complications in patients undergoing ICUD or ECUD were compared. All patients had at least a 90-d follow-up. The Fisher exact test was used to summarize categorical variables and the Wilcoxon rank sum test or Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables.
Of 935 patients who had RARC and PLND, 167 patients underwent ICUD (ileal conduit: 106; neobladder: 61), and 768 patients had an ECUD (ileal conduit: 570; neobladder: 198). Postoperative complications data were available for 817 patients, with a minimum follow-up of 90 d. There was no difference in age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, or rate of prior abdominal surgery between the groups. The operative time was equivalent (414min), with the median hospital stay being marginally longer for the ICUD group (9 d vs 8 d, p=0.086). No difference in the reoperation rates at 30 d was noted between the groups. The 90-d complication rate was not significant between the two groups, but a trend favoring ICUD over ECUD was noted (41% vs 49%, p=0.05). Gastrointestinal complications were significantly lower in the ICUD group (p ≤ 0.001). Patients with ICUD were at a lower risk of experiencing a postoperative complication at 90 d (32%) (odds ratio: 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.50–0.94; p=0.02). Being a retrospective study was the main limitation.
Robot-assisted ICUD can be accomplished safely, with comparable outcomes to open urinary diversion. In this cohort, patients undergoing ICUD had a relatively lower risk of complications.
We prospectively compared perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing extracorporeal urinary diversion and intracorporeal urinary diversion following robot-assisted radical cystectomy. We found that robot-assisted intracorporeal urinary diversion can be accomplished safely, with outcomes comparable to those of open urinary diversion.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Analysis of Intracorporeal Compared with Extracorporeal Urinary Diversion After Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy: Results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium
- Creators
- Kamran Ahmed - MRC Centre for Transplantation, King's College London, Department of Urology, Guy's Hospital, London, UKShahid A Khan - MRC Centre for Transplantation, King's College London, Department of Urology, Guy's Hospital, London, UKMatthew H Hayn - Maine Medical Center, Division of Urology, Portland, ME, USAPiyush K Agarwal - Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USAKetan K Badani - Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USAM. Derya Balbay - Memorial Şişli Hospital, Istanbul, TurkeyErik P Castle - Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USAProkar Dasgupta - MRC Centre for Transplantation, King's College London, Department of Urology, Guy's Hospital, London, UKReza Ghavamian - Montefiore Medical Center, UN Hospital Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USAKhurshid A Guru - Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USAAshok K Hemal - Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, Salem, NC, USABrent K Hollenbeck - University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USAAdam S Kibel - Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USAMani Menon - Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USAAlex Mottrie - Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Ziekenhuis, Aalst, BelgiumKenneth Nepple - Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USAJohn G Pattaras - Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USAJames O Peabody - Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USAVassilis Poulakis - Doctor's Hospital of Athens, Athens, GreeceRaj S Pruthi - University of North Carolina, NC, USAJoan Palou Redorta - Fundacio Puigvert, Barcelona, SpainKoon-Ho Rha - Yonsei University Health Systems Severance Hospital, Seoul, KoreaLee Richstone - Arthur Smith Institute for Urology, New Hyde Park, NY, USAMatthias Saar - University Clinics of Saarland, Homburg, GermanyDouglas S Scherr - Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USAStefan Siemer - University Clinics of Saarland, Homburg, GermanyMichael Stoeckle - University Clinics of Saarland, Homburg, GermanyEric M Wallen - University of North Carolina, NC, USAAlon Z Weizer - University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USAPeter Wiklund - Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, SwedenTimothy Wilson - City of Hope and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA, USAMichael Woods - Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USAMuhammad Shamim Khan - MRC Centre for Transplantation, King's College London, Department of Urology, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- European urology, Vol.65(2), pp.340-347
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.042
- PMID
- 24183419
- NLM abbreviation
- Eur Urol
- ISSN
- 0302-2838
- eISSN
- 1873-7560
- Publisher
- Elsevier B.V
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 02/2014
- Academic Unit
- Urology
- Record Identifier
- 9984051546202771
Metrics
30 Record Views