Logo image
Anonymous living donation expands access and enhances equity in pediatric liver transplantation: A retrospective cohort study
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Anonymous living donation expands access and enhances equity in pediatric liver transplantation: A retrospective cohort study

Toshifumi Yodoshi, Jennifer Stunguris, Maria De Angelis, Krista Van Roestel, Julia Hensley, Yaron Avitzur, Robert H. J. Bandsma, Nicola Jones, Binita Kamath, Mar Miserachs, …
Liver transplantation, Vol.32(6), pp.830-839
06/2026
DOI: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000753
PMID: 41104559

View Online

Abstract

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) confers the best survival to children with end-stage liver disease, yet racial and socioeconomic barriers often preclude access to a biologically or emotionally related donor. Anonymous nondirected LDLT (A-LDLT), whereby altruistic strangers donate, could close this gap and diminish reliance on deceased-donor LT (DDLT), but its equity and efficacy have not been fully quantified. We therefore analyzed all 422 consecutive pediatric liver transplants at a large Canadian center from January 2005 to March 2023. In this retrospective cohort study, we compared recipient demographics, clinical characteristics, waitlist duration, and survival outcomes across A-LDLT (n=62), directed living donor liver transplantation (n=174), and DDLT (n=186) groups. Children who underwent A-LDLT were disproportionately Black or Indigenous, more often lived in single-parent households, and more frequently spoke a non-English primary language, indicating that anonymous donation reached sociodemographically disadvantaged groups. After adjusting for age, diagnosis, era, and pediatric end-stage liver disease/MELD score, median wait time for cholestatic disease was 104 days with A-LDLT versus 138 days with DDLT-a 20% reduction-while operative complexity, vascular or biliary complication rates, and intensive-care stay were comparable to directed LDLT. One-, 5-, and 10-year patient survival rates after A-LDLT were 100%, 98% and 98%, respectively, mirroring directed living donor liver transplantation and exceeding DDLT (96%, 94%, and 93%). Graft survival showed the same pattern. Integrating anonymous nondirected donors enlarges the living donor pool, decreases time to transplantation for vulnerable children, and preserves the superior long-term outcomes achieved with living donor organs. Embedding A-LDLT alongside DDLT can reduce disparities and enable timely, life-saving transplantation for children without directed donors while maintaining the advantages associated with living donor grafts.
Surgery Gastroenterology & Hepatology Life Sciences & Biomedicine Science & Technology Transplantation

Details

Logo image