Logo image
Antimetabolite Dose Intensity and Adverse Outcomes in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A COG-AALL03N1 Report
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Antimetabolite Dose Intensity and Adverse Outcomes in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A COG-AALL03N1 Report

Aman Wadhwa, Yanjun Chen, Lindsey Hageman, Anne Angiolillo, David Dickens, Joseph P Neglia, Yaddanapudi Ravindranath, Amanda Termuhlen, F Lennie Wong, Wendy Landier, …
Blood, Vol.144(22), pp.2327-2335
11/28/2024
DOI: 10.1182/blood.2024024455
PMCID: PMC11619787
PMID: 39190431
url
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11619787/View
Open Access

Abstract

The association between antimetabolite dose intensity (DI) and adverse events among children receiving maintenance therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) remains unclear, especially in context of antimetabolite adherence. Using COG-AALL03N1 data, we examined the association between high DI during the first four study months and (i) treatment-related toxicities during the subsequent two study months; and (ii) relapse risk. Patients were classified into a high DI phenotype (either 6-mercaptopurine [6-MP] or methotrexate [MTX] DI ≥110% during the first four study months, or 6-MPDI or MTXDI 100%-110% at study enrollment and ≥25% increase over the four study months) and normal DI phenotype (all others). Only patients with wildtype TPMT and NUDT15 were included. 6-MP adherence data were available for 63.7% of study participants and used to stratify as adherent (median adherence ≥85%) and non-adherent (median adherence <85%) participants. Multivariable analyses were adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical prognosticators. Of the 644 patients, 29.3% were exposed to high DI. High DI was associated with a 2.1-fold greater odds of hematologic toxicity (95%CI=1.4-3.1; reference: normal DI) in the entire cohort and 2.9-fold higher among adherers (95%CI=1.6-5.1); odds were comparable among non-adherers (2.1-fold, 95%CI=0.4-10.1).. While high DI was not associated with relapse in the entire cohort (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]=1.4, 95%CI=0.8-2.4), it was associated with a greater hazard of relapse among adherent participants (aHR=2.4, 95%CI=1.0-5.5) but not among non-adherent participants (aHR=0.9, 95%CI=0.2-3.8). Dose escalation above protocol doses during maintenance therapy for ALL should be done cautiously after assessing adherence to prescribed therapy.The association between antimetabolite dose intensity (DI) and adverse events among children receiving maintenance therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) remains unclear, especially in context of antimetabolite adherence. Using COG-AALL03N1 data, we examined the association between high DI during the first four study months and (i) treatment-related toxicities during the subsequent two study months; and (ii) relapse risk. Patients were classified into a high DI phenotype (either 6-mercaptopurine [6-MP] or methotrexate [MTX] DI ≥110% during the first four study months, or 6-MPDI or MTXDI 100%-110% at study enrollment and ≥25% increase over the four study months) and normal DI phenotype (all others). Only patients with wildtype TPMT and NUDT15 were included. 6-MP adherence data were available for 63.7% of study participants and used to stratify as adherent (median adherence ≥85%) and non-adherent (median adherence <85%) participants. Multivariable analyses were adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical prognosticators. Of the 644 patients, 29.3% were exposed to high DI. High DI was associated with a 2.1-fold greater odds of hematologic toxicity (95%CI=1.4-3.1; reference: normal DI) in the entire cohort and 2.9-fold higher among adherers (95%CI=1.6-5.1); odds were comparable among non-adherers (2.1-fold, 95%CI=0.4-10.1).. While high DI was not associated with relapse in the entire cohort (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]=1.4, 95%CI=0.8-2.4), it was associated with a greater hazard of relapse among adherent participants (aHR=2.4, 95%CI=1.0-5.5) but not among non-adherent participants (aHR=0.9, 95%CI=0.2-3.8). Dose escalation above protocol doses during maintenance therapy for ALL should be done cautiously after assessing adherence to prescribed therapy.

Details

Metrics

12 readers on Mendeley
Logo image