Logo image
Appropriate use criteria in dermatopathology: Initial recommendations from the American Society of Dermatopathology
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Appropriate use criteria in dermatopathology: Initial recommendations from the American Society of Dermatopathology

Claudia I Vidal, Eric A Armbrect, Aleodor A Andea, Angela K Bohlke, Nneka I Comfere, Sarah R Hughes, Jinah Kim, Jessica A Kozel, Jason B Lee, Konstantinos Linos, …
Journal of cutaneous pathology, Vol.45(8), pp.563-580
08/2018
DOI: 10.1111/cup.13142
PMID: 29566273
url
https://doi.org/10.1111/cup.13142View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Background Appropriate use criteria (AUC) provide physicians guidance in test selection, and can affect health care delivery, reimbursement policy and physician decision-making. Objectives The American Society of Dermatopathology, with input from the American Academy of Dermatology and the College of American Pathologists, sought to develop AUC in dermatopathology. Methods The RAND/UCLA appropriateness methodology, which combines evidence-based medicine, clinical experience and expert judgment, was used to develop AUC in dermatopathology. Results With the number of ratings predetermined at 3, AUC were developed for 211 clinical scenarios involving 12 ancillary studies. Consensus was reached for 188 (89%) clinical scenarios, with 93 (44%) considered “usually appropriate,” 52 (25%) “rarely appropriate” and 43 (20%) “uncertain appropriateness.” Limitations The methodology requires a focus on appropriateness without comparison between tests and irrespective of cost. Conclusions The ultimate decision of when to order specific test rests with the physician and is one where the expected benefit exceeds the negative consequences. This publication outlines the recommendations of appropriateness—AUC for 12 tests used in dermatopathology. Importantly, these recommendations may change considering new evidence. Results deemed “uncertain appropriateness” and where consensus was not reached may benefit from further research.

Details

Metrics

Logo image