Logo image
Are There Age-Related Differences in the Ability to Learn Configural Responses?
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Are There Age-Related Differences in the Ability to Learn Configural Responses?

Rachel Clark, Michael Freedberg, Eliot Hazeltine and Michelle W Voss
PloS one, Vol.10(8), pp.e0137260-e0137260
2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137260
PMCID: PMC4552811
PMID: 26317773
url
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137260View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Age is often associated with a decline in cognitive abilities that are important for maintaining functional independence, such as learning new skills. Many forms of motor learning appear to be relatively well preserved with age, while learning tasks that involve associative binding tend to be negatively affected. The current study aimed to determine whether age differences exist on a configural response learning task, which includes aspects of motor learning and associative binding. Young (M = 24 years) and older adults (M = 66.5 years) completed a modified version of a configural learning task. Given the requirement of associative binding in the configural relationships between responses, we predicted older adults would show significantly less learning than young adults. Older adults demonstrated lower performance (slower reaction time and lower accuracy). However, contrary to our prediction, older adults showed similar rates of learning as indexed by a configural learning score compared to young adults. These results suggest that the ability to acquire knowledge incidentally about configural response relationships is largely unaffected by cognitive aging. The configural response learning task provides insight into the task demands that constrain learning abilities in older adults.
Young Adult Cognitive Aging - physiology Learning - physiology Age Factors Motor Skills - physiology Humans Adult Female Male Aged Reaction Time - physiology Task Performance and Analysis

Details

Logo image