Journal article
Are contact precautions “essential” for the prevention of healthcare-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ?
Clinical infectious diseases, Vol.78(5), pp.1289-1294
09/21/2023
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciad571
PMID: 37738565
Abstract
Abstract The recently updated SHEA/IDSA/APIC practice recommendations for MRSA prevention in acute care facilities list contact precautions (CP) for patients known to be infected or colonized with MRSA as an “essential practice”, meaning that it should be adopted in all acute care facilities. We argue that existing evidence on benefits and harms associated with CP do not justify this recommendation. There are no controlled trials that support broad use of CP for MRSA prevention. Data from hospitals that have discontinued CP for MRSA have found no impact on MRSA acquisition or infection. The burden and harms of CP remain concerning, including the environmental impact of increased gown and glove use. We suggest that CP be included among other “additional approaches” to MRSA prevention that can be implemented under specific circumstances (e.g. outbreaks, evidence of ongoing transmission despite application of essential practices).
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Are contact precautions “essential” for the prevention of healthcare-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ?
- Creators
- Daniel J Diekema - University of IowaPriya Nori - Albert Einstein College of MedicineMichael P Stevens - West Virginia UniversityMatthew W Smith - University of IowaK C Coffey - University of Maryland, BaltimoreDaniel J Morgan - University of Maryland, Baltimore
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Clinical infectious diseases, Vol.78(5), pp.1289-1294
- DOI
- 10.1093/cid/ciad571
- PMID
- 37738565
- NLM abbreviation
- Clin Infect Dis
- ISSN
- 1058-4838
- eISSN
- 1537-6591
- Language
- English
- Electronic publication date
- 09/21/2023
- Academic Unit
- Infectious Diseases; Internal Medicine
- Record Identifier
- 9984472651802771
Metrics
24 Record Views