Journal article
Are deep infections that present before and after 90 days from orthopaedic trauma different? An analysis of the validity of the recent change in CDC criteria for infections
Injury, Vol.53(3), pp.912-918
03/01/2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.10.020
PMID: 34732287
Abstract
•In 2016, the CDC changed the time frame for their definition of deep surgical site infection to within 90 days of surgery.•Of the 452 infections analysed in this study, 144 occurred beyond 90 days (32%). Of the infections that occurred after 90 days, 135 occurred by 365 days (94%).The need for flap coverage is more common in those patients presenting with infection beyond 90 days.•Predictors for early infection include male sex and fractures of the pelvis, acetabulum, or hip.•Hepatitis C and/or HIV and ICU admission are predictors of late infection.
In 2016, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) changed the time frame for their definition of deep surgical site infection (SSI) from within 1 year to within 90 days of surgery. We hypothesized that a substantial number of infections in patients who have undergone fracture fixation present beyond 90 days and that there are patient or injury factors that can predict who is more likely to present with SSI after 90 days.
A retrospective review yielded 452 deep SSI after fracture fixation. These patients were divided into two groups—those infected within 90 days of surgery and those infected beyond 90 days . Data were collected on risk factors for infection. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to compare the two groups. A randomly selected control group was used to build infection prediction models for both outcomes. The two outcomes were then modelled against each other to determine whether differences in predictors for early versus late infection exist.
Of the 452 infections, 144 occurred beyond 90 days (32% [95% CI, 28%–36%]). No statistically significant patient factors were found in multivariable analysis between the early and late infection groups. The need for flap coverage was the only injury characteristic that differed significantly between groups, with patients in the late infection group more likely to have needed a flap. When modelled against the control group and directly comparing the two models, predictors for early infection include male sex and fractures of the pelvis, acetabulum, or hip, whereas predictors of late infection include hepatitis C and/or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU).
Use of the recent CDC definition will underestimate the rate of actual postoperative infections when applied to orthopaedic trauma patients. Hepatitis C and/or HIV and ICU admission are predictors of late infection, whereas male sex and pelvis, acetabulum, or hip fractures are predictors of early infection. Patients who receive flap coverage may be more likely to present with late infection.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Are deep infections that present before and after 90 days from orthopaedic trauma different? An analysis of the validity of the recent change in CDC criteria for infections
- Creators
- Brent T. Wise - University of Maryland, BaltimoreDaniel Connelly - University of Maryland, BaltimoreMichael Rocca - University of Maryland, BaltimoreDaniel Mascarenhas - University of Maryland, BaltimoreYanjie Huang - Johns Hopkins UniversityMichael A. Maceroli - University of Maryland, BaltimoreManjari Joshi - University of Maryland, BaltimoreRenan C. Castillo - Johns Hopkins UniversityRobert V. O'Toole - University of Maryland School of Medicine
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Injury, Vol.53(3), pp.912-918
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.injury.2021.10.020
- PMID
- 34732287
- NLM abbreviation
- Injury
- ISSN
- 0020-1383
- eISSN
- 1879-0267
- Publisher
- Elsevier Ltd
- Number of pages
- 7
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 03/01/2022
- Academic Unit
- Orthopedics and Rehabilitation
- Record Identifier
- 9985014848302771
Metrics
6 Record Views