Logo image
Assessment of Response to Induction Therapy and Its Influence on 5-Year Failure-Free Survival in Group III Rhabdomyosarcoma: The Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study-IV Experience—A Report From the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children's Oncology Group
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Assessment of Response to Induction Therapy and Its Influence on 5-Year Failure-Free Survival in Group III Rhabdomyosarcoma: The Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study-IV Experience—A Report From the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children's Oncology Group

Megan Burke, James R Anderson, Simon C Kao, David Rodeberg, Stephen J Qualman, Suzanne L Wolden, William H Meyer and Philip P Breitfeld
Journal of clinical oncology, Vol.25(31), pp.4909-4913
11/01/2007
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.4257
PMID: 17971587
url
https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.10.4257View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Purpose Initial response to induction chemotherapy predicts failure-free survival (FFS) in osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma. For Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS) IV patients with group III rhabdomyosarcoma, we assessed whether reported response assessed by anatomic imaging at week 8 predicted FFS. Patients and Methods We studied 444 group III patients who received induction therapy, had response assessed at week 8 by anatomic imaging, and continued with protocol therapy. Induction chemotherapy was generally followed by radiation therapy (RT) starting after week 9. Response to induction therapy was determined at weeks 0 and 8. Local institutions coded response. Results Response rate for the entire cohort at week 8 was 77% (95% CI, 73% to 81%; complete response [CR], 21%; partial response [PR], 56%) but response had no influence on FFS (P = .57). Two hundred seventy-two patients received standard-timing RT at week 9 and thus only chemotherapy during induction. Response rate was 81% (95% CI, 76% to 86%; CR, 22%; PR, 59%). In these patients, response did not influence FFS except for those with alveolar histology. One hundred thirty-two other patients received chemotherapy and RT during induction (up-front RT). Response rate was 65% (95% CI, 57% to 73%; CR, 12%; PR, 53%), but response had no influence on FFS (P = .69). Forty patients received no RT at all (protocol violation) and response to induction therapy had no effect on FFS. Conclusion In IRS-IV, response rate to induction therapy was 77% in group III patients, was independent of histology, and had no influence on FFS overall.

Details

Metrics

Logo image