Logo image
Associative concept learning in animals
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Associative concept learning in animals

Thomas R Zentall, Edward A Wasserman and Peter J Urcuioli
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, Vol.101(1), pp.130-151
01/2014
DOI: 10.1002/jeab.55
PMCID: PMC3927728
PMID: 24170540
url
http://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.55View
Open Access

Abstract

Nonhuman animals show evidence for three types of concept learning: perceptual or similarity-based in which objects/stimuli are categorized based on physical similarity; relational in which one object/stimulus is categorized relative to another (e.g., same/different); and associative in which arbitrary stimuli become interchangeable with one another by virtue of a common association with another stimulus, outcome, or response. In this article, we focus on various methods for establishing associative concepts in nonhuman animals and evaluate data documenting the development of associative classes of stimuli. We also examine the nature of the common within-class representation of samples that have been associated with the same reinforced comparison response (i.e., many-to-one matching) by describing manipulations for distinguishing possible representations. Associative concepts provide one foundation for human language such that spoken and written words and the objects they represent become members of a class of interchangeable stimuli. The mechanisms of associative concept learning and the behavioral flexibility it allows, however, are also evident in the adaptive behaviors of animals lacking language.
Animals Species Specificity Cultural Evolution Generalization, Stimulus Humans Reinforcement (Psychology) Cognition Pattern Recognition, Visual Association Learning Communication Concept Formation Discrimination Learning

Details

Metrics

Logo image