Journal article
Bibliometric Analysis of Contributions of Anesthesiology Journals and Anesthesiologists to Operating Room Management Science
Anesthesia and analgesia, Vol.138(5), pp.1120-1128
05/2024
DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006694
PMID: 38091575
Abstract
Anesthesiology journals appear to have been progressively publishing a smaller percentage of operating room (OR) management studies. Similarly, non-anesthesiologists have increasingly been authors of these publications. Five hypotheses were formulated to evaluate these impressions based on 2 of the authors' curation of an online, comprehensive bibliography of OR management articles and corresponding referenced course materials.
We studied all 2938 publications having Scopus' SciVal topic T.6319 (OR management) more than 28 years from 1996 through May 2023, including 8608 distinct authors.
Half (50%) of the publications were absent from PubMed, and the percentage absent has been increasing progressively (Kendall's τ = 0.71; P < .0001). Fewer than half were published in journals including anesthesiology as the sole classification (20%) or as one of the classifications (27%). The anesthesiology journals have been publishing a progressively decreasing fraction (τ = -0.61; P < .0001). Among the 11 authors each contributing at least 1% of the OR management science publications, 9 were anesthesiologists and the other 2 had anesthesiologists as coauthors on all these publications. Only 3% of authors had at least 10 OR management publications from earlier years. There were 75% of authors with no such earlier publications and 85% with 0 or 1. There was a progressive increase in the number of authors publishing OR management annually and with at most 1 such earlier publication (τ = 0.90; P < .0001). Only 20% of publications had any author with at least 10 earlier OR management publications, 48% had every author with no such earlier publications, and 60% had all authors with 0 or 1.
Although most of the authors with the greatest production of OR management science were anesthesiologists, the percentage of publications in anesthesiology journals has been decreasing progressively. Anesthesiologists cannot rely solely on anesthesiology journals to keep up with the field. For most publications, every author had few or no earlier publications on the topic. Clinicians and managers relying on OR management science will continue to need to apply more information when judging whether published results can reliably be applied to their facilities.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Bibliometric Analysis of Contributions of Anesthesiology Journals and Anesthesiologists to Operating Room Management Science
- Creators
- Franklin Dexter - University of IowaSara Scheib - University of IowaWei Xie - University of Iowa Libraries, Iowa City, IowaRichard H Epstein - University of Miami
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Anesthesia and analgesia, Vol.138(5), pp.1120-1128
- Publisher
- International Anesthesia Research Society
- DOI
- 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006694
- PMID
- 38091575
- ISSN
- 0003-2999
- eISSN
- 1526-7598
- Language
- English
- Electronic publication date
- 10/27/2023
- Date published
- 05/2024
- Academic Unit
- Humanities and Social Sciences/Scholarly Impact; Anesthesia
- Record Identifier
- 9984530389702771
Metrics
112 Record Views