Logo image
Bond Durability of Two-Step HEMA-Free Universal Adhesive
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Bond Durability of Two-Step HEMA-Free Universal Adhesive

Akimasa Tsujimoto, Nicholas G Fischer, Wayne W Barkmeier and Mark A Latta
Journal of functional biomaterials, Vol.13(3), p.134
08/29/2022
DOI: 10.3390/jfb13030134
PMCID: PMC9505787
PMID: 36135569
url
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb13030134View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare bond durability, in terms of fatigue bond strength, of a two-step HEMA-free universal adhesive and representative adhesives in each systematic category. The adhesives used in this study were OptiBond FL, Prime&Bond NT, Clearfil SE Bond 2, G2-Bond Universal, and Scotchbond Universal Plus Adhesive. Fatigue bond strength testing and scanning electron microscopy analysis of adhesively bonded enamel and dentin interfaces were performed. For the adhesives in etch-and-rinse mode, the enamel fatigue bond strength of the G2-Bond Universal adhesive was significantly higher than those of other adhesives, and the dentin fatigue bond strength of Prime&Bond NT was significantly lower than the others. For adhesives in self-etch mode, the enamel fatigue bond strengths of Clearfil SE Bond 2 and G2-Bond Universal were significantly higher than that of the Scotchbond Universal Plus Adhesive, and the dentin fatigue bond strength of G2-Bond Universal was significantly higher than Clearfil SE Bond 2 and the Scotchbond Universal Plus Adhesive. The two-step HEMA-free universal adhesive showed higher enamel and higher or equal dentin fatigue bond strength than other selected representative adhesive systems in etch-and-rinse mode and higher or equal enamel and higher dentin fatigue bond strength than adhesive systems in self-etch mode.

Details

Metrics

Logo image