Logo image
Bronchodilator Responsiveness in Tobacco-Exposed Persons with or without COPD
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Bronchodilator Responsiveness in Tobacco-Exposed Persons with or without COPD

Spyridon Fortis, Pedro M Quibrera, Alejandro P Comellas, Surya P Bhatt, Donald P Tashkin, Eric A Hoffman, Gerard J Criner, MeiLan K Han, R Graham Barr, Mehrdad Arjomandi, …
Chest, Vol.163(3), pp.502-514
03/2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.11.009
PMCID: PMC9993341
PMID: 36395858
url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2022.11.009View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND Bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR), in obstructive lung disease varies over time and may be associated with distinct clinical features. RESEARCH QUESTION Is consistent BDR over time (always present) differentially associated with obstructive lung disease features relative to inconsistent (sometimes present) or never (never present) BDR in tobacco-exposed people with or without COPD. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data of 2,269 tobacco-exposed participants in SPIROMICS with or without COPD. We used various BDR definitions: change ≥200ml and ≥12% in FEV1 (FEV1-BDR), in FVC (FVC-BDR), and in FEV1 and/or FVC (ATS-BDR). Using generalized linear models adjusted for demographics, smoking history, post-bronchodilator FEV1 %predicted, and number of visits that the participant completed, we assess the association of BDR group: i) consistent BDR, ii) inconsistent BDR, and iii) never BDR with asthma, CT features, blood eosinophils, and FEV1 decline in participants without COPD (GOLD0) and the entire cohort (participants with or without COPD). RESULTS Both consistent and inconsistent ATS-BDR were associated with asthma history and greater small airway disease (%PRMfSAD) relative to never ATS-BDR in GOLD0 participants and the entire cohort. We observed similar findings using FEV1-BDR and FVC-BDR definitions. Eosinophils did not consistently vary between BDR groups. Consistent BDR was associated with FEV1 decline over time relative to never BDR in the entire cohort. In GOLD0, both inconsistent (OR=3.20;95%CI 2.21 to 4.66;P<0.001) and consistent ATS-BDR group (OR=9.48;95%CI 3.77 to 29.12;P<0.001) were associated with progression to COPD relative to never ATS-BDR group. INTERPRETATION Demonstration of BDR, even once, describes an obstructive lung disease phenotype with history of asthma, and greater small airway disease. Consistent demonstration of BDR indicates a high risk for lung function decline over time in the entire cohort and was associated with higher risk for progression to COPD in GOLD0.

Details

Metrics

Logo image