Logo image
Back
Characterization and longitudinal assessment of daily quality assurance for an MR‐guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) linac
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Characterization and longitudinal assessment of daily quality assurance for an MR‐guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) linac

Kathryn E. Mittauer, David A.P. Dunkerley, Poonam Yadav and John E. Bayouth
Journal of applied clinical medical physics, Vol.20(11), pp.27-36
10/21/2019
DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12735
PMCID: PMC6839363
PMID: 31633882
url
https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12735View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Purpose To describe and characterize daily machine quality assurance (QA) for an MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) linac system, in addition to reporting a longitudinal assessment of the dosimetric and mechanical stability over a 7-month period of clinical operation. Methods Quality assurance procedures were developed to evaluate MR imaging/radiation isocenter, imaging and patient handling system, and linear accelerator stability. A longitudinal assessment was characterized for safety interlocks, laser and imaging isocenter coincidence, imaging and radiation (RT) isocentricity, radiation dose rate and output, couch motion, and MLC positioning. A cylindrical water phantom and an MR-compatible A1SL detector were utilized. MR and RT isocentricity and MLC positional accuracy was quantified through dose measured with a 0.40 cm2 x 0.83 cm2 field at each cardinal angle. The relationship between detector response to MR/RT isocentricity and MLC positioning was established through introducing known errors in phantom position. Results Correlation was found between detector response and introduced positional error (N = 27) with coefficients of determination of 0.9996 (IEC-X), 0.9967 (IEC-Y), 0.9968 (IEC-Z) in each respective shift direction. The relationship between dose (DoseMR/RT+MLC) and the vector magnitude of MLC and MR/RT positional error (Errormag) was calculated to be a nonlinear response and resembled a quadratic function: DoseMR/RT+MLC[%] = −0.0253 Errormag [mm]2 − 0.0195 Errormag [mm]. For the temporal assessment (N = 7 months), safety interlocks were functional. Laser coincidence to MR was within ±2.0 mm (99.6%) and ±1.0 mm (86.8%) over the 7-month assessment. IGRT position–reposition shifts were within ±2.0 mm (99.4%) and ±1.0 mm (92.4%). Output was within ±3% (99.4%). Mean MLC and MR/RT isocenter accuracy was 1.6 mm, averaged across cardinal angles for the 7-month period. Conclusions The linac and IGRT accuracy of an MR-guided radiotherapy system has been validated and monitored over seven months for daily QA. Longitudinal assessment demonstrated a drift in dose rate, but temporal assessment of output, MLC position, and isocentricity has been stable.
 daily QA MR guidance MR linac QA MRgRT MR‐guided radiotherapy Radiation Oncology Physics RT isocenter

Details

Metrics

8 Record Views
22 Times Cited - Web of Science
Logo image