Journal article
Cheating on Multiplechoice Exams: Monitoring, Assessment, and an Optional Assignment
College teaching, Vol.57(1), pp.3-8
01/01/2009
DOI: 10.3200/CTCH.57.1.3-8
Abstract
Academic dishonesty is unethical. Exam cheating is viewed as more serious than most other forms (Pincus and Schmelkin 2003). The authors review the general cheating problem, introduce a program to conservatively identify likely cheaters on multiple-choice exams, and offer a procedure for handling likely cheaters. Feedback from students who confess and complete the assignment is positive.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Cheating on Multiplechoice Exams: Monitoring, Assessment, and an Optional Assignment
- Creators
- Leda Nath - University of Wisconsin–WhitewaterMichael Lovaglia - University of Iowa
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- College teaching, Vol.57(1), pp.3-8
- Publisher
- Heldref
- DOI
- 10.3200/CTCH.57.1.3-8
- ISSN
- 8756-7555
- eISSN
- 1930-8299
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 01/01/2009
- Academic Unit
- Sociology and Criminology
- Record Identifier
- 9984306242302771
Metrics
12 Record Views