Journal article
Clinical Validation of an Adult Acquired Buried Penis (AABP) Classification System Based on Standardized Evaluation of the Penis (P), Abdomen (A) and Scrotum (S)
Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), Vol.180, pp.249-256
10/2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.04.048
PMID: 37507025
Abstract
Objective
To clinically validate a previously developed adult acquired buried penis (AABP) classification system that is based on a standardized pre-operative physical exam that subtypes patients by their penile skin/escutcheon complex (P), abdominal pannus (A) and scrotal skin (S).
Methods
The Trauma and Urologic Reconstruction Network of Surgeons (TURNS) database was used to create an AABP cohort. Patients were retrospectively classified using the previously described PAS classification system. The frequency of subtypes, surgical methods utilized for AABP repair, and correlations between PAS classification and surgery subtypes were analyzed.
Results
The final cohort consisted of 101 patients from 10 institutions. Interrater reliability between two reviewers was excellent (κ=0.95). The most common subtypes were P2c (contributory escutcheon + insufficient penile skin; 27%) and P2a (contributory escutcheon + sufficient penile skin; 21%) for penile subtypes, A0 (no pannus; 41%) and A1 (non-contributory pannus; 39%) for abdominal subtypes, and S0 (normal scrotal skin with preserved scrotal sulcus; 71%) for scrotal subtypes. AABP repair procedures included escutcheonectomy (n=59, 55%), scrotoplasty (n=51, 48%), split-thickness skin grafting (n=50, 47%), penile skin excision (n=47, 44%) and panniculectomy (n=7, 7%). P, A and S subtypes were strongly associated with specific AABP surgical techniques.
Conclusion
The PAS classification schema adequately describes AABP heterogeneity, is reproducible amongst observers, and correlates well with AABP surgery types. Future work will focus on how PAS subtypes affect both surgical and patient-centered outcomes.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Clinical Validation of an Adult Acquired Buried Penis (AABP) Classification System Based on Standardized Evaluation of the Penis (P), Abdomen (A) and Scrotum (S)
- Creators
- Charles H Schlaepfer - University of IowaKevin J Flynn - University of IowaNejd F Alsikafi - UroPartners, Gurnee, IL, USABenjamin N Breyer - University of California, San FranciscoJoshua A Broghammer - University of KansasJill C Buckley - University of California San DiegoSean P Elliott - University of MinnesotaJeremy B Myers - University of UtahAlex J Vanni - Lahey Institute of Urology, Burlington, MA, USABryan B Voelzke - Spokane Urology, Spokane, WA, USALee C Zhao - New York University, New York City, NY, USABradley A Erickson - University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA. Electronic address: brad-erickson@uiowa.edu
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), Vol.180, pp.249-256
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.urology.2023.04.048
- PMID
- 37507025
- NLM abbreviation
- Urology
- ISSN
- 0090-4295
- eISSN
- 1527-9995
- Language
- English
- Electronic publication date
- 07/26/2023
- Date published
- 10/2023
- Academic Unit
- Urology
- Record Identifier
- 9984455489602771
Metrics
11 Record Views